if charles was a bit bigger at least this would be prime vs prime. but prime charles was <175. love charles but i'm picking parker 3/5.
longevity is the thing that makes the debate hard.
they all beat him up. he was dirty as **** but the refs and judges were paid for. i like a dirty fighter. he wanted to win. but vs these guys...
hills the smart pick but i kinda see it being a tear up that barkley could well win.
i'd think holmes.
basilio
i'm not sure why but he def is. you can see it in his face and hear it in his voice when he gets asked a question about floyd.
a mixture of jealousy and a preference for a different style. floyd is one of the best ever unless you rank purely by how long ago they fought or...
i agree with both.
it's unlikely but not impossible. cunningham dropped him after all.
are we pretending that sexy man weighed in under the same rules? if it was a fair fight i'd pick lamotta. if we are giving sergio the 20-30lbs...
i wouldn't want to get hit by him.
he might have beat young vlad but the physical matchup is heavily against joe.
no. apart from a million to one first punch knockout dempsey cannot beat usyk.
just for the fun i hope he said galento.
