Louis is the weakest of the 3.
Any pre-1920's boxer would get absolutely schooled by their modern counterpart for the most part. In fact imo even champs from that era would be...
Clay was done after '76 imo. Tyson was done post-prison (but if you wanna get technical imo he was gone by 1990), and definitely any vestige of...
Anyone who really thinks that Lewis and Klitschko are the two greatest HWs of all time, h2h or otherwise, cannot be taken seriously. It's as...
Geezus lol! :patsch
This would be a great fight to see. I think prime Frazier wins most of the time, but prime Bowe does possess the potential and ability-skills to...
Agreed. If i had to narrow it down, i'd say the same for the most part. My three picks would be before 1920, early 1930's, and 1998 - present....
I think Hatton was a great fighter too. I have tons of respect for the guy.
No offense taken. No disrespect to you either. I know boxing. I'm referring to their skills, not their integrity or character as professionals in...
I absolutely agree with you. (although i still think Mayweather Jr is a great fighter)
Before the 1910's, the sport was nothing more than glorified toughman contests. (And before Queensberry, it was even worse, organized street...
This is a joke, right? lol. I'll concede that Griffin wasn't necessarily a bad fighter, but he is not ATG material. He never beat RJJ.
Yes, i know who Jim Corbett was. Do you know what Boxing is? My post stands.
Imo, late 20's/early 30's, late 50's/early 60's, late 70's/early 80's, 98/99 - present. What do you think?
Prime Frazier every time.