he was he was 60 or 70 something for consistincy he rates low but for peak power he make up for that i might rate him number 6 after moore
i didnt even know tyson fought ruddock
yes look at willians leading jack on to his power. and jack was great and durable
yes and this makes armstrong look even mpre impressive i think took more to get a knockout but maybe actually on the other hand you did have...
bump just wanted some opinions agree or disagree
hmm maybe we should say a time and we both post on the time lol just to prove it
i think ambers beat mayweather one time other than that mayweather dominates,,, great fighters adapt. and he is great but he wouldnt destroy...
of all time why?? well he doesnt have a good knockout record. not my number 1 puncher armstrong who at prime was killing every dude.ok armstrong...
yes it was used to be eubanks but now is eubank anyway i am not a troller
no sry
hmmmmmmm my own p4p goes like this greb armstrong robinson benny langford charles pep duran moore fitz i think
i could say 115 and be happy good fighter wow you have lots of posts you must know you're stuff
where does he go??? top 30??? top 50??? 100?????????????? even.. maybe we can fit him somewhere
lol i think you are paranoid i just ask if hagler could step up like toney. toney stepped up so obviously i cant think small fighters are...
thickness thick arms thick legs etc thick head no joke he take punches well thick wallet lol tight with money
