I'm not sure I'd rate him higher myself, probably right around the same spot. Frazier has one of the greatest wins of all time going for him....
McNeely lost to Butterbean.... I'm picking Allen here within a few rounds.
Wlad is a terrible match up for him.
I'm assuming you don't want the obvious ones, there would be too many to name. I think Louis beats Marciano Wlad beats AJ
But 90s Foreman wasn't a worse version in EVERY way than the 70s version so I'm not sure it's that simple.
I don't think picking Holy over any heavyweight in history should be very controversial. He's an iron chinned atg and he's pretty versatile.
He's a beefy guy with huge legs, I'm sure he weighs 250.
He's still young so having stay busy fights isn't the worst thing for him. A guy like Vianello might give him some tough rounds. Frazier...
Nielsen would have an atg resume if he beat those guys in their primes. Wilder had the better resume and was the better fighter imo.
Good scrap. I think Rahman was at his best here.
6'3-6'5 220-240. I don't think being any bigger than that is an advantage.
Maybe. But Tua would beat Sanders, and Byrd would beat Peter
Andy ruiz would be a big name and might be a winnable fight at this stage.
Makes me mad that I have to work a crappy job full time and I can manage to stay in reasonable shape and some pro athletes can't even be bothered....
A few interesting ones Tyson - Had the chin, speed and power. Prime Tyson would be more likely to box though, any other version brawls and...
