I think he's one of the best for sure very few boxers I would favor over him but whethere's the best best idk tough to say.
Even if that's true (which personally I don't think he did) I would say Hearns struggled even more with Hill (losing 3-4 rounds overall more then...
I really don't see what you guys see in those fights where Bivol dominated and didn't lose a single round especially when he fought other rangy...
Sure but why would Bivol style be bad against Hearns I'm trying to understand the logic here when he's proven it works very well in the pros.
Not as much as Lewis lol
But he also never lost to a fighter on the level of Barkley and I don't think Hearns would have been able to beat Beterbiev at all. Canelo and...
Why not? Its worked against plenty of very good LHWs some of which had a decent size advantage over Bivol. Especially with the size advantage...
8-4 Usyk the two close rounds were 2 and 12 Usyk landed more clean shots but Bredidis landed the harder ones but I have both to Usyk especially...
What's wrong with that style of boxers? They seem to be doing well in the modern day and he showed he can deal with a tough boxer with a more...
It was a short notice fight where he was fighting more aggressive then usual but considering he didn't lost a single round doesn't really say...
Not really he knocked out Zinad without any issues and outboxed Umar without any issues.
Maybe Old Toney would beat Old Jones
I think Bivol beats him Hearns was past his best at that point and Bivol hits hard enough to trouble Hearns plus being too skilled for Hearns to...
Beat you to it bum
Seems like a common issue with you makes you wonder........
