He was still ranked in the top 10 in 1966. Fact of the matter is Oscar is more dangerous than anyone tyson fought in his first 12 fights.
"George did not know it, but while I may have been standing, I was out cold. He could have pushed me over with his little finger. How I survived...
He was top 3 just the year prior.
Wrong again. Oscar was coming off a win over George chuvalo. Frazier was 11-0 with no notable wins.
The fight was in 1966.
What makes you think that? Because I pointed out that judging a fighter based on his 12th match against a top contender is unreasonable?
What about him? We’re comparing Frazier and tyson here, not foreman. and? That’s irrelevant. Who was tyson fighting in his first 20 matches who...
Yeah, because he was fighting buster Douglas. He still got hit just as often as Frazier did, if not more so. And Frazier wasn’t at his best...
Yes, but he had more success defending against Ali than all his other opponents.
Bout as well as it did against buster douglas for Tyson.
No one made Ali miss more than Joe Frazier. Joe proved his defence over more rounds, against better competition.
Try to make the bait look believable at least.
Well you’re bad at getting it across. It’s sorta’ve the same as saying boxers like Greg page are not that good because he isn’t good as Muhammad Ali.
This doesn’t make much sense. Tyson admits on camera that some of his fights were fixed and you make a bunch of baseless assumptions to defend...
Mike Tyson is on camera admitting some of his fights were fixed. Does that discredit his entire career and abilities as a boxer? Unlike tyson...
