For sure. Around 79-81 would be the go i think.
They'd sure be awkward fights at least, neither will be a walk in the park contrary to a lot of opinion. Holmes didn't blow over a lot of houses...
I take the vote differently. Tyson clearly has the better resume yet 25% have voted he doesn't. One quarter. That's tells a story to me.
It's a good match mate. I think Weaver was just a bit better too.
This is it in a nutshell. It's very straight forward. Performance vs their peers - Joe Louis comfortably. Perceived H2H achievements vs ones...
Personally yes, i think it does. Sure, he sure has his huggers but he's got a lot of critics/haters that have trouble assessing him fairly too....
The irony. Eddie Futch literally stopped the Thrilla in Manila because he was worried Frazier might get killed, never be the same again or end up...
Good work buddy. You know how much trouble we all have reading headers and thread titles :lol:
"BEFORE becoming a champ?" It should have been in the first header instead of inside the thread.
There isn't one. For starters, who makes 25 straight title defenses in the greatest era ever? It virtually contradicts itself. To further strain...
Ruddock invests ridiculously in his left hook which in all likelihood gives him more power. It also held him back as a fighter.
Just to get this straight........you are saying Joe's era was the strongest ever?
Lyle isn't dynamic enough to beat Frazier.
Berbick's aggression works against him. Trevor is a bit like Norton, he has a fine chin.....until he hasn't. Both could take punches off, say, a...
I'd have Tyson a couple of spots above Liston. Tyson's run gets fobbed off and minimised way too much. I would minorly favor Liston H2H but would...
