He never rematched Nunn at 160, or 168. Not ever. Do you think Nunn did not to earn a re-macth nor not?
My definition is he has the lineal title. End of. The Jeffries vs Johnson fight was signed before 5 years from his retirement. Got it?
Te details that and more are here: https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/35417116?downloadScope=page
Jeffries announced his retirement in 1905. 5 years from that is what? He did defend against Johnson didn't he?:nonono Or do you want to apply...
Benton
GGG hits the hardest, is the most skilled, and has the probably has the best chin.
Vs a 35 or 36 year old McCallum? I think it's safe to say he'd have some trouble may lose one vs GGG's competition. Nunn was very good fighter...
Yes, but he is undefeated. Ward retired young. https://www.boxingnews24.com/2013/05/calzaghe-didnt-duck-ward/
He was visibly slower GGG was by 35-36 . He was past his prime.
I agree with you on the first fight, I had it 8-4. The second fight I had it GGG...so did lots of people. Now do you think GGG was past his...
So you saying he GGG won the first fight then?
Yes the were, but that is not the question. Where do you stand on the topic?
At middle weight? Somewhere is the top 30 of all time.
He beat Canleo really twice if you being honest, wouldn't you say? A prime Nunn and McCallum, well GGG was not in his prime for Canelo....
Greg Price wrote. I’ve already given you my definition for the conditions that must be met for a fighter to lose their lineal title. Once again...