LOL. Then nobody ever beat Duran in Duran's prime. This is what Mag does. he claims Leonard wasn't in his prime in June 1980, but gives...
Mag is doing that thing again. He is actually ignoring the first 13 years of someone's boxing career. No joke.
One thing that has to be determined on this board is how far down in the ranking do you have to be, to be considered an alltime great. I...
With Mag there is really no reason for fighters to actually fight. he just ignores the outcome, and spins what should have happned.
Hearn's in his prime at his best got totally destroyed by Hagler. Yet Mag holds it against Duran that at 32 and way past his best weight, he lost...
Spinks was scared to death. It was obvious. He looked scared and all he did was cover up. I have never seen a fighter so scared. But I guess I...
:patsch
How about Leonard vs Norris in the 90s?
Rooster doesn't think his is either. Give us the list of the 20 fighters you rank about Duran. I know in the past you said M. Spinks was one.:lol:
Someone should start a thread asking who is more ridiculous out of Rooster or Mag. I know I have seen Mag say that Duran was really bigger then...
Duran also had a better common apponent record then Hearns. And this despite the fact that Duran was the older, smaller fighter in all of these...
I think I already said I don't know why Duran quit. But don't be an idiot here. If he quit because he had to take s ****, thats hardly a lame...
For once.name the 20 or so fighters you rate above him. Your post doesn't mean crap unless you name the 20. mag once again basically ignores...
No not really.
I don't know why Duran quit. If it was because he had to take a poo like Gorden said and backed up, not sure why that would be a lame exuse. I am...
