Too big? Oh the irony.
It's situational. When these attributes become really apparent is when the fighter has every other conceivable advantage to.
If it's fighters that moved through or could have fought at 168 before the division was made, I would rank a good 35 fighters to beat Calzaghe.
The only sport that has improved is Athletics and that is because drugs are both hugely suited to the events and used by nearly every competitor....
How to beat him is put him in any other era. Or another option would be put him in against a live fighter.
It would be nice if he turned that theory in to a reality.
<Rushes off to watch some more footage of Stevenson.
Hearns got hit by punchers when he chose to brawl, like in the Hagler fight where he was coming off of knocking out Duran and was too hot on...
Have you even seen the Leonard fights? Any which way Hearns has all of the tools.
What has Hagler got to do with this? Marv would take Floyd's head off, thats hardly the point. There is no disgrace in getting caught by Hagler....
If i were you i wouldn't draw comparisons either. Because all of those fighters would be favourites against Mayweather.:deal
This would be a bad choice. He has the quick everlasting flurries already. He can't be improved in that respect, he certainly isn't going to...
If Hearns is robotic **** knows what a mover looks like. The guy was an unreal athlete. To even say this makes you look very stupid.
:rofl
I don't really know much about this guy. His record looks good and from the few clips i have seen, he has a sweet left. Could anyone enlighten me...
