1. Power 2. Body punching 3. Defense 4. Footwork 5. Distance control
I'll go with Calz. Someone mentioned this already, but he has a lot of filler (title defenses) in his resume. I also like his top wins over...
List is invalid. No Calzaghe.
Skimmed through it. I heard what you said about Mayweather & Pacman. Floyd isn't 2nd and Pac isn't 4th. Pep should be higher IMO (22). Ward should...
I think there was something up with Wlad vs. Brewster I....
Such a lazy excuse. I find it hard to believe that a sport where you can make a 9 figure payday in a night has "trash" boxers. Usyk is exceptional...
Ike has 2 names on his resume. Povetkin has several more plus he was an Olympic Gold medalist. AP clears Ike easily.
Doubt it. Probably looks like the Mercer fight.
Not a chance. You're saying an almost 37 year old Tyson was better than an almost 27 year old Wlad? That's ridiculous. Wlad was also ranked higher...
How long have you been following boxing? Everyone says that every era is weak.
Finally!
Probably the most overrated HW boxer ever. Too big of a wildcard to pick against Wlad. Made a name of beating up on smaller guys. Wlad via clear UD.
Disagree about your amateur point. I understand what you are saying about the amateurs not being included in the accomplishments of professional...
Probably John Farinacci who went by "Johnny Farr". He fought Kid Chocolate on 5/1/1933 for the junior lightweight title in Philly. He lost by UD....
It doesn't matter.
