I'd put the guy who lost to an MMA fighter in last.
Vayson - 2, 4 Collazo - 1, 3, 5, 6 Vayson's corner stopped it? They must've seen something I didn't, good round for Collazo but not a stoppage...
Dang, just caught the knockdown slomo, I agree it's shouldn't've been a kd. Do they have replay here?
Vayson - 2, 4 Collazo - 1, 3, 5 I think round 5 was the first hard to score round, rounds 1-4 pretty clear.
Got it 2-1 for Collazo (1 and 3), with 1 kd.
I agree, Usyk is number one. That said, I don't think one needs to tear down Crawford's accomplishments to hold that opinion.
Don't know if I'd rather be a foreign fighter fighting in the USA or UK, or a Japanese fighter fighting in Japan.
If Crawford clearly beats Canelo there's a good chance the judges still give it to Canelo.
First fight I had 8-4 GGG, second 7-5 to GGG, and the third I stopped scoring after the 8th, feeling that GGG needed a knockout, or multiple...
If Crawford manages that then I suppose I'll have to admit I know just enough about boxing to be correct about as often as random chance.
I'll be watching. I still think Crawford vs Canelo is a bad fight.
Was a **** fight when it was rumored. **** fight when confirmed. Still a **** fight.
"Canelo is officially 2-0-1 against Golovkin...Deal with it" immediately followed by "Derev whom you could argue beat him [GGG]" is the type of...
Garbage ref. Check around 1:04 of the OP's video. [MEDIA]
what was the point of that?
