and when i mention pacquiao blocking or evading many of marquez's punches in some of the rounds (but not in most rounds).. i think thats what gave...
Pacquiao looked like a beaten fighter at the last round because Marquez was able to finish strong and won the last round thats the reason why...
Marquez was clearly dominating round 3 before that knockdown??! LoL.. are you serious??!! both fighters were landing tit 4 tat during that round...
those people who are calling this a robbery are idiots!!!!!! because there are enough close rounds where the fight could logically go either way!!!!
robbery??!!! it was a very close fight that could've gone either way..!!!! no way that this was a robbery!!
Pacquiao Marquez 2?? a robbery??!! oh come on!! that was a very close fight that could've gone either way and there are a lot of big robberies...
those people who are saying that marquez are robbed as idiots.!!! because there are enough close rounds where the fight could logically go either...
those people who kept saying that marquez dominated the whole fight are delusional...!!! it was clearly a dead even fight and both fighters had...
what?!! are you serious...??!! it was a very very close fight that could've gone either way... the problem with those people who kept saying that...
and how the hell did marquez won round 11??? many of his punches during that round were blocked and missed...
and there are also punches of pacquiao that were not counted so i think that guy who made the videos made some mistakes
one thing i've noticed about those videos by alisjab is that there are some parts of the fight that are not played in slow-mo.. only the selective...
I think their point of watching those close rounds in slow-mo is to see how accurate those punches that the fighters throw.. remember.. there are...
what??!! clearly & widely??!! are you serious..??!! that was a very very close fight that coud've gone either way.. if you watch the whole fight...
