There are a few out there and they have good price tags - anyone vote for a certain one over others, to save money on buying them all?
Good things have never been said about a retiring fighter? lol - thats exactly when they are. If he was such a great advocate then why not have...
Again though; its called PRIZEfighting. Which fighter has not chose to fight for money? The concensus #1 best ever himself (Robinson) fought for...
Fair enough. Thanks for the book reference. Another poster said he had many more fights than 39, any idea what the number was?
Perhaps I misread you. But can anyone name me an example of a big time fighter taking the terms in this case? I don't think so, and im sick of...
Yikes I hope not too many people read this cause you will turn them dumber. To everyone reading: this is blatantly wrong and misguided so disregard
You have a good book to recommend?
Still there has to be a divide. Otherwise where is the 20 year roman or greek champ on peoples lists? I think it was Cleitomacheus My...
Again, it wasn't him pushing it so much as it being easier to accept under the guise of "a set of rules" in an exhibition match. I mean if...
Its hard to include him simply because with what you are claiming is including bareknuckle fighters in boxing - which is a different sport
lol, read what i put above. sullivan didnt "save" anything - and thats not a knock on him, its just the truth. you just esentially said it...
eh you are backtracking now, no need
Perhaps because the only way to do it was under Queensbury rules since bareknuckle was illegal? Of course boxing itself was still illegal most...
its called prizefighting - every single fighter in the history of the sport fights for the money (especially the draw fighters), plain and simple....
I hate to tell you, but Sullivan didn't "transform" or "fundamentally change" the sport himself, he just happened to be there.
