Érik Morales vs. Juan Manuel Márquez

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, Feb 24, 2016.


  1. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004

    I think there are some people out there that haven't bothered to watch JMM from his earlier 126 lbs days.

    I think to much emphasis is paid to Morales' trilogy with MAB, and not enough to everything else. His lackluster performances against Chi and Espadas, and his stamina issues in each of his fights with MAB.

    As well, a lot of people just look whats on paper. Two losses by Marquez to Norwood and John and its like to them, "this guy has no business in a ring with Morales during that time because the record shows two losses.

    Some as well have the opinion that Marquez got better later in his career.

    I'm of the opinion that Marquez prime was served at featherweight and because he was more verasatile than the other two Mexicans, he was able to hone his boxistical abilities to where he was at as far as his physical capabilities.
     
  2. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,394
    83,260
    Nov 30, 2006
    True, judging Márquez by the Norwood and John results is as unfair as (more than, actually) dismissing Morales' chances against Márquez based on a lesser technician in Raheem managing to outbox him. :think
     
  3. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    Exactly! Raheem outboxing Morales tells us zero of the way Marquez would go about it. Completely different styles.

    I think the closest style to Marquez' that Morales fought was MAB, but in Marquez you add the throwing the right hand with more force and consistency and you add the uppercuts Marquez throws with consistency.
    There's more to look out for when you're fighting Marquez and that imo would factor big in a Morales-Marquez fight.
     
  4. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    36,612
    29,161
    Feb 25, 2015
    I'm pretty sure that many people have followed Morales' career. All these struggles you point to didn't happen at 130 pounds and below. Please besides the first MAB fight show me a robbery in an El Terrible fight below 135 pounds. He just kept on winning and winning and winning.
     
  5. alspacka

    alspacka Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,989
    30
    Dec 16, 2015
    Having rewatched a load of their fights in the past few days, I think JMM would've had Morales number in any era. EM reaches too much, jumps in a lot. Big chance it'd look a lot like KO6 actually.
     
  6. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    36,612
    29,161
    Feb 25, 2015
    You need to stop saying Marquez was the most verstaile of the 3 Mexicans because the most skilled was clearly MAB.

    Power in both hands as evidenced by his knockdowns with his right and his left. Best body attack of any. Most fluid pocket combination puncher. Never off balance. Best single punch (left hook) of any of the three. Excellent brawler, excellent stalker, excellent boxer.

    His biggest downfall as a fighter was his inability to handle extreme speed which isn't really related to his skills rather his relatively poor physical attributes.
     
  7. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    36,612
    29,161
    Feb 25, 2015
    And what weight was the Raheem fight fought at? Erik Morales for what it's worth simply didn't carry the same effectiveness past 130 pounds.

    Marquez was outboxed by lower level technicians in John and Norwood.
     
  8. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,394
    83,260
    Nov 30, 2006
    I have a hard time seeing any single one counter punch from Márquez switching Morales' lights off. :think

    ..but that sort of lunging (especially with the lead right at times) could lead to abundant point-scoring opportunities - and maybe even knockdown(s) for - for Dinamita, absolutely. :good
     
  9. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    Morales doesn't jump in like that, but I do think that MAB was pretty close to stopping Morales at 122 lbs and where MAB failed, Marquez wouldn't.
    Think Marquez would have targeted that skinny frame of Morales' and when the pace slowed some, Morales would be looking to brawl on the inside as staying sharp at center ring requires more energy.
    On the inside Marquez would tear into Morales' body.
    Tear up the body and head will fall.

    Late in the fight is where I see a depleted Morales susceptible to Marquez' uppercuts on the inside.

    Morales is brave, much braver than MAB so I do see Marquez in a scenario where he stops Morales.
    Not like KTFO6 though, on accumulation with Morales going out on his shield.
     
  10. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    36,612
    29,161
    Feb 25, 2015
    Morales has skinny arms, shoulders and chest. Which means nothing in boxing. He's got thick legs for his weight class. He's got a strong core and thick lower back. And he's tall and strong.

    Marquez can't stop him.
     
  11. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,394
    83,260
    Nov 30, 2006
    Speaking of Morales' ripped but skinny frame, contrasted with Márquez being always more solid and thickly muscled yet comparatively doughy and less toned, at least through super feather - who do we suppose is the physically stronger man? (not that I'd expect many clinches)

    Depend largely on the weight and/or epoch?
     
  12. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    29,269
    15,090
    Dec 6, 2008
    I honestly have no idea who would win. I think Morales' jab would be a good weapon vs JMM but it's a toss up for me.
     
  13. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    Marquez doughy? :huh
    Certainly not at 130 lbs and below.

    I think Morales is one the one that's looked a little bit soft above the lightweight limit.

    Marquez imo is naturaly the bigger fighter of the mini-fab four.
    Not by much, but he's naturally a little big bigger than the other three, though Pacquiao always has stepped into the ring weighing more than all of them and he's a fighter that came from even below 122 lbs.
    Go figure! :think
     
  14. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,394
    83,260
    Nov 30, 2006
    Pac has the largest skeleture/frame of the bunch.

    Márquez certainly wasn't fat in the feather range (in fact had a pronounced 6-pack throughout his prime), just wasn't as taut and wiry as El Terrible.
     
  15. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    When I've seen side by side stills of Marquez and Pacquiao, Marquez' frame to me looks bigger than Pacquiao.
    I'm talking about side shots at the shoulder area.

    Of course we both know that Pacquiao has much bigger legs.
    Not sure about the wrists, maybe Pacquiao is a little bigger there, but from the waist on up, Marquez just looks the naturally bigger fighter to me.