Érik Morales vs. Juan Manuel Márquez

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, Feb 24, 2016.


  1. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    36,612
    29,171
    Feb 25, 2015
    The thing about Marquez is you just have to deal with the results of close decisions. Yea he thinks he won the Pacquiao fights. But it is what is. He lost. I think what eats him most if he didn't officially pick up a victory in the first two fights.

    And lets not pretend he wasn't the beneficiary of some close decisions. Like the the Barrera fight which if not for that BS 3 point swing he probably loses.
     
  2. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    348
    Jul 13, 2007
    Imo...both are capable of dropping each more in the third epoch...each have slowed down somewhat... especially Morales.
     
  3. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,394
    83,260
    Nov 30, 2006
    I'm even more of a Barrera fanatic than a JMM one, actually (MAB is the one that got me seriously into boxing and turned me from a casual into a die-hard) - but I've never bought that it was a robbery. Nor do I think it some major knock on Márquez that he even had a close-but-clear victory with a "shopworn" Barrera. Yes, Marco looked terrible later in the year in Pacquiao II, but the difference is he "got up" for Márquez and had the fire in his belly and really wanted it. Márquez gets a lot of credit for that victory, and I don't think officially counting the knockdown should've changed the result either. (and remember, it wouldn't have been a full three point swing; Barrera still landed a blatant hit while Márquez was down, which is still a point deduction no matter what, meaning at best for Barrera he gets that one 9-8 - which is 10-8 minus the point deduction).
     
  4. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    348
    Jul 13, 2007
    Do you think that Barrera has a slight stylistic edge over JMM and Morales? It seemed like after the Junior fights, that Barrera could roll, and return fire very well...that served him very well...against orthodox fighters anyway.
     
  5. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    36,612
    29,171
    Feb 25, 2015
    I thought about the third Morales Pacquiao fight and the resignation more.

    Morales could always go toe to toe. But against Pacquiao he finally ran into a tornado that he couldn't stand toe to toe with.

    Morales was never the less physical fighter ever. Then he finally found a guy who was more physical than him. And he refused to stomach it and box his way to victory.
     
  6. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,394
    83,260
    Nov 30, 2006
    I don't even know if boxing his way to victory was an option that night. He wasn't going to get away from Pac's constant volleys. He was just totally overwhelmed.
     
  7. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    36,612
    29,171
    Feb 25, 2015
    Barrera slower pace and dual hands are stylistic problems for Marquez IMO. Marquez can take any one thing away from you. But against Barrera he was troubled by the versatility of a Barrera.

    And Barrera had a style advantage over Morales too. Because again his versatility and body punching. Barrera because of his versatility gives him the style advantage over most fighters.

    Pacquiao was a style nightmare for Barrera. Because Pacquiao won't sit still for his body attack. And Barrera is vulnerable to straight lefts after he throws his left jab.
     
  8. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    36,612
    29,171
    Feb 25, 2015
    You're probably right but even as he was being physically overwhelmed he still chose to strafe Pacquiao.
     
  9. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    348
    Jul 13, 2007
    Good stuff...I liked that breakdown(s) and agree.
    Addendum: But we are talking about incremental advantages (imo)...these guys are close.
     
  10. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,394
    83,260
    Nov 30, 2006
    Very good point about MAB slowing the pace down. He was great at throwing a spanner in the gears and making it a grind, where he could excel with his very educated hand placement in the skirmishes. He may have even been the greatest of all three Mexicans in terms of technically sound pocket warfare and landing accurate yet lengthy combinations. Morales liked to lead and Márquez preferred to counter but El Asesino was able to make them both swap leather with him for prolonged stretches and never let them get off too many unanswered...or land without getting hit back.

    That same tendency backfired on him with Pacquiao just due to Pac having SUCH a massive edge in hand speed and being aN Energizer bunny.
     
  11. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    348
    Jul 13, 2007
    Well said...Do you think JMM took a page from this approach when he went up in weight, against Diaz, Juarez, Casamayor etc...? He didn't against Pac though for the reasons stated.
     
  12. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,394
    83,260
    Nov 30, 2006
    Most likely yes. They would never admit it openly but I think all three Mexicans followed each other's careers very closely and probably never missed a fight.

    ...and yeah with Pac he elected to hyperfocus on "the right shot at the EXACT right moment"...which is how KO6 ended up manifesting. Juan had the full measure of Manny, perfectly scouted arguably even as early as their draw but more and more as they fought over the years.
     
  13. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    I don't agree.
    Marquez' dissatisfaction has always been lured towards the judges.
    He's never done himself any favors with them as he's always criticized their intentions and lack of integrity.
    His fights with Casamayor, Diaz, and Katsidis were competitive, but not competitive enough to how close the judges had those fights scored.
    Judges don't like being critiqued and they've certainly made Marquez pay in that regard.

    Pacquiao is completely out of Marquez' system, you just see it in him everytime he speaks on the issue.
    Its not really about sticking it to Pacquiao.
    A fifth fight simply will never happen because Marquez knows whats real, and whats real is that the only way he gets a victory over Pacquiao is to put him in a coma again.
    Aint going to get better than taking Pacquiao out at his own game!

    I would go as far as to say that out of the mini-fab four, I think Marquez is going to end up the fighter that's most at piece with his body of work. I really do!
     
  14. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    348
    Jul 13, 2007
    Yup...I agree on both counts.
    Pac took him to the brink of hell though...
     
  15. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,394
    83,260
    Nov 30, 2006
    They were perfectly matched rivals. All four were excellent fights, a gift to boxing fans.

    The fourth was the least entertaining & pretty, but it had the greatest finish (and I'm not just saying that because it was my guy that scored the sensational KO :lol:)