10 point must system illogical..

This kid is actually hurt because i insulted his mum on an internet forumatsch

 

look at sweaty-shitbag teeto still running for cover from the issue of his shame:

 

:rofl

 

:yikes look at this cat's turd-box teeto sprinting for cover from boxing talk that is leaving him shamed and embarrassed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

victory :smoke

 

Owned,

 

Real productive here, guys.

 

I do agree that a KD shouldn't swing 3 points from a 9-10 to a 10-8, thats ridiculous

Teeto I respectfully disagree with you on the KD should be the only way to score a 10-8 round. If Lamotta didn't go down in the final round against Robinson would that not be a 10-8 in your view?

I actually think there should be a distinction between close rounds and dominant rounds, with a dominant being a 10-8, maybe a KD in that case should give a 2point swing. The only thing is I'm not sure if that's giving more rope for the judges to screw fighters or resolve the existing problems in boxing. Overall it may encourage fighters to be more aggressive/active

 

my last few posts have been asking teeto to confront a post which he keeps avoiding:

while his last few posts have been "die"... "your mum"... "owned"... "die"...

:dead

the guy is clearly a 15 year old turd who got the roberto duran career set for his Xmas off his daddy, who can't even defend his position on any issue because it doesn't stand up, because he's a moron. :deal

 

Well yeah i would have scored it 10-9, i've got to be honest, i'm not being a **** and sticking to my guns or anything PP, I just see it this way. I don't mind a respectful disagreement, just joke clowns talking out of their arse trying to patronise me and ****, you know how it is.

 

Is this troll trying to make me angry or something? I answered your post hours ago, you can't answer.

Is this troll trying to make me angry or something? I answered your post hours ago, you can't answer.

 

Fair enough, 1 thing I thought about the Hopkins-Taylor fights was, there were no clear 10-8s, BUT, Hopkins won his rounds far clearer but I thought Taylor won more rounds (I was a Taylor fan at the time so maybe a little off), do you think wider points is a good idea for more clear wider rounds?

PErsonally I don't think any system is exempt from corruption and close fights are always problematic, but it maybe an idea

 

It's definitely something i'd entertain the thought of yeah, and consider. I think first and foremost the sport needs to be redefined in terms of how it is contested, is it points accumulated or is it the nature of the win? If it's the nature of the win then what you propose is the way forward, but if it is simply points acquired then it doesn't matter to me how you win the round, if i win six rounds just about and you clearly win 6 rounds then it is a draw. It seems that the politics of the game heavily favour the nature of the win philosophy though, that's why you get bogus scorecards going to the aggressor even when they put in ineffective aggression, but that's the corruption you speak of. It's a difficult one.

 

why is this 15 year old imbecile who got the roberto duran career set off his Daddy for Xmas now telling blatant lies???


his "answer" was not to that post at all, as a quick look back at the thread proves.


my original post was this:

and the 15 year old who got the duran career set off his daddy for Xmas did give a kind of "answer" to that (an answer that underlined how dumb his position is):

but then his shabby logic got harpooned again, and his dumb position was revealed once more:

and these were the cretin's responses:

what a mongtard. he doesnt have a clue how boxing is scored, or how it should rightfully be scored.


number of clean punches landed is not relevant to teeto, but if he thinks someone shows heart then he gives them extra points...

you'd be a great judge :rofl:rofl:rofl

 

We all have our days.