10 point must system illogical..

I agree. I also would like to add that I think judges should score more 10-10 rounds if you're uncertain. You don't need to just give it to one of the fighters if it's really really close.

It's not perfect, and maybe there's a better system or a better way to readjust the system. However, I'd like to remind people that all systems have flaws. It seems to be the best way of scoring we've had (At least to my knowledge).

 

don't **** me off kid, it's been broken down for you, **** off

 

no ****in way you old lady's ****-bag, you aint running from dealing with this post, it will keep following u until u admit that ur a mongtard who thinks this:

admit it so i can laugh at you some more, teeto-**** :rofl:rofl:rofl

 

Yes if a round is close and uneventful and a kd is scored, the guy who scored it should win 10-8, i've said this already. Yes, the round without a kd is 10-9 in my book, regardless of the nature of the round. Now answer my question Raskol-jerk-off

 

This is the question ****o

 

what a dumb ***, sticking to your idiotic guns after being embarrassed on every page of this thread!!


if fighter A beats the living **** out of fighter B and doesn't get a KD, I'd score it 10-8, to show how one-sided the round was, as compared to a pretty even 10-9 which may have occurred earlier in the fight

if fighter A beats the living **** out of fighter B AND scores a legitimate KD, I'd score it a 10-7, depending on the severity of the beating - if one guy is getting chased round the ring and utterly beaten down and humiliated, of course it could be another point, you score to show how the fight has transpired mongbitch :rofl:rofl:rofl


here's another level to your brutal stupidity:


- fighter 1 is taking a shellacking from fighter 2, getting beaten up on the ropes, cut, staggered more than once, holding on for dear life, and with 10 secs to go in the round, he connects with a hook while fighter 2 was opening up to swing, it knocks fighter 2 off balance a little, and his glove hits the floor. the ref has no choice but to give him a count.

10-8 for fighter 1 mongbitch?


- fighter 2 dominates, beats down, humiliates, toys with, hurts, damages fighter 1, chases him round the ring, has fighter 2 holding on for dear life, the most one-sided domination imaginable in 3 minutes.

10-9 for fighter 2 mongbitch?

so if these were the 1st 2 rounds of a fight, you think it would be right to have fighter 1 up by 19-18, even though he has landed less than 5 punches and fighter has landed 100 punches.


u really r a crudfart man. u think the scoring of boxing should have no way to show how the fight has actually gone. shame on ur dumb diseased ass atsch

 

:yikes



:happy:happy:happy

This content is protected

:deal


:smoke

 

Most of the criticisms against the "10-point must system" are actually criticisms against the way it's come to be implemented.

The 10-point must means the winner of the round must get 10 points (barring any referee mandated deductions), and the loser gets less than 10.
The gap between winner and loser is reflected by the gap between winner's 10 and the loser's score.

All this stuff about knockdowns should be irrelevant, and at the judge's discretion. Of course, KDs should be rewarded, but that could mean anything.
And I think it's bizarre how the orthodoxy has made the range of points become so limited.
A 10-7 or 10-6 round should be possible without even scoring a knockdown necessarily. It's insane that a 10-9 score is often being used to decide a razor-close round and a very clear one too (in the same fight !) !

 

Raskol-Jerk-off

What a dumb twat, ok then so you prove my point, in the two round scenario i posted the kd would be irrelevant on your card, end/discussion

10-7 in a round with one kd? You're done.

 

This in an ideal world. What's the point of having 10 points anyway. Might as just be the 5 points must. The way it is now it might as well be scored by rounds. i don't agree with 10-8 rounds either just because someone has been knocked down when the action in the ring might show that the other fighter has been dominant the rest of the round.

 

When have i said this you son of a ***** ******? You can't even read you blind ****** *****. This is what i disagree with. **** OFF, YOUR FAMILY IS DEAD

 

Round 1- Figher A gives fighter B the beating of his life, both men stay on their feet

Round 2- Fighter B gives fighter A the same beating, returns the favour, ****s him up, but knocks his man down.

Should both rounds be 10-8? No, fighter B should be rewarded for the kd. Round one is 10-9 to fighter a, round two is 10-8 to fighter b, therefore the kd is reflected in the scorecards. To give round one 10-8 and round two 10-7 is ****ing ******ed, this ***** is exposed.

 

This kid is a fan of fighting and not boxing, let me expose his vile life once and for all-

I'm a defensive minded master, i've mastered boxing in terms of defense. My opponent is a heavy handed brawler. My opponent comes out all guns blazing and gives me a shellacking for the first 5 rounds, i'm hurt in every round but don't go down. I then take over and use my skills and totally negate his offense for the next 7 rounds and school him, but i don't hurt him physically or drop him.

This idiot would give the first five rounds 10-8 to the opponent and the last seven 10-9 to me, because he thinks it's all about brutaltiy and being a hard street fighter. This would not be reflective of the fight because i adapted and boxed beautifully for the remainder of the fight, i should win because i won more rounds than my opponent in good fashion.

Owned. And yes you're still a scumbag with a slut mum!

 

except... they arent.

so great line, you ****ing anal-discharge sodden rat. atsch

u need to calm down lol, talking about family coz you r being laughed at for not understanding how boxing should be scored.

you're someones' down syndrome nephew, don't be sad about that!! :smoke

 

look at this ugly hairy fanny still talkin **** and getting owned, pages later.


look, you think this scenario is a-OK:

so you are a MONGTARD. that is all!!! :rofl:rofl:rofl