10 point must system illogical..

nut:nut

sorry Tranny Claus, but ur reaching & failing now on every page.

you still agree with this:

so u r still the kid in this photo, thats the only thing that could explain your levels of warped degraded behaviour:

This content is protected

so owned again. your p-o-v is a ******ed one, but i'm enjoyin poking fun at it, so keep coming back you ****** 15 year old who got the duran career set off his dad for xmas and thinks boxing scoring should not show how the fight has gone...

atsch

 

Well done, you can post photos.

You've been annihilated.

 

10-6 without a knockdown? Sounds like giving up too much liberty. That seems too open-ended and open to interpretation then.

 

I know you two are going at it but I really don't think it's so absurd to grant round 1 10-8 and round 2 10-7. It's like the SRR-LaMotta last round had it not been stopped. That would've been perfectly appropriate to score a 10-8 round. Had LaMotta been dropped while still getting pummeled I don't see why the round can't be 10-7 for Robinson. Just a different interpretation, neither is truly wrong.

 

I get what you're saying about the 10-8 round but i just think it's totally wrong to give the second round 10-7, and the only reason a judge would be doing it would be so that the kd would be reflected, for me i'd just give the first 10-9 in the first place so i wouldnt be giving 10-7's in rounds with one kd purely to make up for it. I agree that nobody is truly wrong though, because it is left up to the judge today whether to score a 10-8, there's no strict criteria, and for me that's a problem. Because where does it stop? You can actually give a 10-8 for a round that you consider to be one-sided, but it's totally in your judgement, it can and has caused controversy. It should be reserved for knockdowns imo. And if i'm beating the **** out of you/schooling you embarrassingly and then you score a flash kd over me then to me it logically should be an even round. I know this isn't common practice but to me personally it is right. Like you say though, there is no strict criteria for 10-8 so nobody is wrong or right, to me that's ****.

 

i myself am not for the compulsory 10-8 for a knockdown if that is what it is. Seems to me that there are knockdowns of all kinds of different degree. it's just down to the refs discretion. You can have a fighter touch canvass after a cuffing shot when he's off balance and all of a sudden it's a 10-8 round. This usually happens when you are in another mans country. Same fight and the home fighter takes a heavy knockdown and that is 10-8 also assuming the ref calls it a legit knockdown that is.
For me the points available should be used in a 5 point must and even then i'd probably go no lower than a 5-2 but i'd score plenty 5-3 and really close rounds 5-4.
It would be interesting to score some fights we've scored ourself using this and see how it compares.

 

yeah, interesting. Same here though Al, i don't like it when the kd automatically means 10-8, it's just not right to me, and that's what happens. For instance if you are being dominated and then score a kd you win 10-8, that's not right for me.

 

Its a judgment call. For a flash-knockdown, ,maybe not. But if the dominator is seen to be hurt sufficiently by the knockdown, then 10-8 is warranted. We don't count punch-stats, we count effective aggression.

 

Of course we count effective aggression, as well as many other things, including ring generalship etc

 

if it went to your system it will be very inconsistant

 

I 100% agree with you teeto.:good
It should be 9-9, same difference if scored 10-10 but it should be 9-9, that is the way I have always personally scored it.

 

On a slightly different matter people should score even rounds, even {10-10} if there is nothing in the round, people should score it even, otherwise if you score it 10-9 on a whim, then when one boxer does have the upper hand in a round you wont be rewarding him as you will be scoring it the same as a very close round.
I will score a beatdown as a 10-8 round, very rare indeed, but I will score a beatdown as a 10-8.
I will score a beatdown and a knockdown as a 10-7 {very rare}, I once scored a 10-6 round for a beatdown, a knockdown and a point deduction.

The big issue in boxing scoring imo is the lack of even rounds, which can skew a result, one boxer can win 8 'even' rounds 10-9, the other boxer clearly wins the other 7 rounds 10-9 {ok I remember 15 round fights} and you get a false result in my opinion.
As without round scoring, one boxer clearly won the fight, but with round scoring the other boxer could win the fight, a true representation needs to be recorded.

Therefore a drawn round should be a drawn round 10-10, having the better of the round should be a 10-9, total dominance should be 10-8, and for a knockdown round there should be a point deducted.
That is the way I do it anyway.

 

:good always thought that is the logical thing to do personally

 

excellent post. you clearly have a rational mind, and understand that scoring should show how the fight went.



teeto is an unwashed prostitute whose scoring system would cripple boxing if it were to ever be used.

 

another cop-out from a terrified orphan who uses his sexual organs to make friends.



you're a dumb **** who has been getting embarrassed and owned for pages and pages.



read back, and see your shame -



and, you still agree with this, even after its extreme stupidity has been pointed out to your cross-eyed ass again and again:

so are still the kid in the picture, a warped ****ed-up little cretin, hahaha!


Owned. Again. Want some more?

:smoke:smoke:smoke