Anyway if you guys really wanna hear some dumb statements you guys you should just like to the Mayweather family!
Floyd said 100 stupid things alone in one interview. http://adoseofdopeness.wordpress.com/2010/01/09/interview-ra-the-rugged-man-x-floyd-mayweather-jr/
I'm not about to sit down and listen to the bull**** Mayweather has to spew......he could very well have said it, but he'd be the only one doing so. No one in their right mind is accusing the Pinoys' of being drug cheats, thats what I was getting at when a poster insinuated that Pac could'nt be doing it because there is'nt any precedence with Pinoy athletes.
No, what I am trying to say is Pac is one of the all time greats. Not because he KOd or TKOd Diaz, Hatton, Oscar or Cotto, but because he has been doing this his whole career. It did not start when he fought at the weltherweight, but when he started boxing. He went 5-1-1 with the Mexican greats just an example even while moving up. Note also that he was already 3 time linear champ even before he fought Hatton. With respect to sharing the supposed enhancing drugs, this is where you misunderstood Filipinos once more. If you studied our culture, you will know that we can't seldom keep a secret especially to our relatives. And if it is something beneficial then with more reason to share it. You can't have it both ways, either Manny knows he is taking it or not. If we follow your reasoning, he knows he can't pass the test hence the refusal to take the random test. If he does not know, then, all your arguments about not sharing and keeping it a secret lost its basis. It can be argued both ways, what man will insist on a test at the risk of losing the 40 million. If Mayweather believes he can defeat Pac (for being a one dimensional, not enough ring intelligence or talent) then why ask for a condition neither acceptable to your opponent nor legally mandated by the commission. The bottom line is we can only speculate on the possible reasons on why Floyd and Pac refused to go thru with the fight without any conditions. In the same manner that we can only speculate on why Floyd turned his back on boxing for almost two years when he could have beaten and made more than 100 million fighting the Cottos, rematch with Dela Hoya, Mosleys and Margaritos of the world.
The Mayweathers for one. And if you solely based your accusation on that Toney incident, would the international community be not justified in concluding that all Americans Athletes are cheats because of precedents? As you can see, it is not correct to simply accuse one athlete of drug use just because another athlete from the same gym was proven to be one.
I'm not accusing Pacquiao doping based on James Toney being caught...... The *******s on this forum have said that Pac has passed every test, and someone in this very thread insinuated that there should'nt be any suspicioun of Pac because the Pinoy athletes have not excelled in the past in Olympic competition......that person was dismissing Pac based on there not being any precedence with the Pinoy athlete winning medals or even getting caught cheating at such events......as if this automaticallly exonerated Pac..... ......to which I posted that if you wanted precedence by association (which was'nt what I was accusing Pac of).....you did'nt have to look any further than Pac's own Gym mate and Freddie Roach pupil, James Toney!!!
Divac, Pac has the benefit of doubt in this case until proven otherwise. Thus, I submit that negative precedence is a valid and reasonable defense herein. While guilt by precedent is not, simply because it contradicts the time honored principle of presumption of innocence. Besides, can a third country really come up with an undetectable drugs that can make one invicible as the Mayweathers opined? If you truly believed this, you are then giving us too much credit.
You have it confused t.......I dont give a **** what the Mayweather's say.....but anyone with common sense knows that Pac can get his PED's from anywhere in the world, not just the Phillipines.
Reading comprehension is really not your forte. He was simply saying that if you are a fighter, fight. If you lose, then make your alibis if you want, but fight first. Your logic is eschewed if you use examples of alibis after a fight has already occurred. To simplify it for your simpleton mind, Pac was simply saying do not be a chicken. Pac's alibi was after he fought, whereas Floyd's alibi is how not to have a fight. Still can not make the difference? Try to google ducking.
Pac is on roids that is why he put JMM on his butt 4 times. There, you read it and I am sure you are now happy.
Manny barely speaks English. I doubt there are even 100 quotes of his in exsistence. And posting them here would be for sad ****s and haters.
You can keep on trying to convince yourself of that......nobody is saying he's perfected the language, but he understands it and speaks it fine right here in this embarrasing link...... [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCa1-X7ey5Y[/ame] I believe that ESPN edited that TV interview.......the interview was actually longer, here's the full interview without the video....... [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdgRzKV9b9I[/ame]