$1000 to the first person to name 50 fighters better than Floyd Mayweather Jnr

I can argue mccallum is better than both, but i wont do that.

Nunn was top 3 p4p, something nelson was never his entire career. You have to look at how they were ranked when they fought them, not how they would turn out. James toney has twice as many top wins and hes the more skilled fighter on film, p4p i would most likely pick him to outbox the overrated sanchez.

 

I odnt even know why sanchez is being mentioned in the same breath, if tyson died before the buster douglas fight, he would be treated like a god too. I'm sure snachez would have had more Ls on his record if he kept fighting, and you know, duckin pedroza.

Mccallum has beat:
kalambay
toney once arguably
julian jackson
donald curry
mcrory
kalule
herol graham
jeff harding
collins
watson


You're going to tell me gomez record is better than that, gtfo. Gomez got a gift against lockrdige and he ****in lost to a can. there is no way gomez's top wins are better than mccallums, unless ur a crackhead.

 

Nunn at his best was never as good as the Nelson that fought Sanchez imo, irrespective of where he was ranked. If you want to talk about rankings, well, Gomez was ranked top 3 p4p at one stage.

Toney had twice as many top wins? Rubbish! What he did have was twice as many embarassing losses and controversial decisions.

 

Tyson's best wins were against a way past his prime Holmes and a past prime Spinks. Sanchez's wins against Nelson and Gomez were of an entirely different calibre. Both men were close to being at the top of their game.

 

how can u all of a sudden determine spinks was shot, he was in the p4p rankings, undefeated and never seriously hurt or damaged. You know at least janitor can admit hes worn at some points and we can have good debates. You, u just think you're right at everything dont you, does it make u feel better that u think ur just some arrogant know it all.

 

sanchez was just known to look bad against a few green fighters, he never even fought pedroza and never planned to, hes a mystery, no one knows how great he truly is.

Azumah was GREEN, deal with it, god does it hurt ur pride to admit anything!

Tysons list of opponents during hsi title run is more impressive anyways, he was beating the top opposition, He cleaned his division in devastatign fashion, something sanchez failed to do.

Sanchez looked so ordinary against cawdell and garcia, he went life and death with ford and a green azumah gave him hell. I know he would have been exposed if he would have fought more.

 

Gomez did lose to Lockridge and Layne but so what? He was done by that stage. More worrying is McCallum losing to Kalambay near his prime.

McCallum is a great fighrer and has a lot of good wins (though the likes of Curry, McCrory and Kalule were past their best when Mike beat them) but so does Gomez.

Zarate is better than anyone McCallum beat imo. Add to that the likes of Pintor, Kobayashi, Hernandez, Lopez, Perez, Meza, Laporte, Yum. That's a very decent resume. His only loss in his prime was to Sanchez, another great - greater than Kalambay for sure.

 

Spinks lost to a past his prime Holmes and you know it. He was also coming off a year without fighting.

 

Toney is very inconsistent though. For every excellent win you can find a bad loss or near loss.

 

zarate is better than anyone he beat, good ****ing lord. I'm done with you, you understand that, dont even reply to my ****in post cuz im nbot going to answer back. Yeah carlos zarate a guy that padded his record as much as he could and lost to the 4 best fighter he ever faced is better than curry and james toney. Two men that were as high as #2 p4p and beat far more fighters. mcclallum is greater than gomez, im out for tonight, dont respond cuz i hate dealing with mr. know it alls.

 

Zarate has beat 60 out 66 fighters that were bums, and this joke is telling me hes better than james toney and donald curry, you make me laugh. Gomez beat a smaller fighter, while mcallum beat light heavytweights and middleweights.

 

Pedroza has more controversial decisions than James Toney. I think Sanchez beats him and if he lived, he no doubt would have faced him or move up in weight. If he was facing the likes of Gomez and Lopez I don't know why he'd fear Pedroza.

Azumah was green but he fought like a man possessed that night. Writing the win off just becuase he wasn't seasoned is a disgrace. That Nelson beats some great featherweights, I have no doubt.

Doesn't change the fact that Sanchez's top wins are still better.

I dont think Pedroza would have expossed him. Pedroza was struggling with Laporte, Lockridge, Taylor, and other blokes in between. I think he decisions Nelson in a rematch, and he probably wouldn't lost until running into a young Chavez or perhaps Camacho when moving up in wieght. By which time, his legacy would have been secured.

 

has this guy paid up yet!!

 

How much do you know about Zarate's opponents other than what boxrec tells you? I'm guessing **** all.

You've probably only seen his fight with Gomez and possibly his fight with Zamora, so how can you be qualified to speak about whether he's better than Curry and Toney?

 

well pedroza isnt an atg so im not going to talk about his controversial decisons. Zarate is not better than toney ro curry, not even close. 60 bums, how can someone pad thier record so much. the 4 best fighters he ever faced beat him, talk about a fraud, carlos i fight mexcian cab drivers zarate is a fruad.