114-113 Hopkins, so says the Associated Press, ESPN.com and many ESBers.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Club Fighter, Apr 20, 2008.


  1. nervousxtian

    nervousxtian Trolljegeren Full Member

    14,049
    1,098
    Aug 6, 2005
    The low blow was not faked, the reaction? Maybe over the top, but it bought a tired fighter time, but the rules he was due up to 5 minutes. There should be no dispute over the shot landing low, there is video evidence of it happening.

    Honestly, the best reaction was Hokins when Max questioned him on it, and kept showing a video of Joe clearly hitting him below the belt, and Max just sat there like he was thinking "well, we're stupid".
     
  2. thoughtmc007

    thoughtmc007 New Member Full Member

    24
    0
    Apr 19, 2008
    The person using the MORE dirty tactics was JOE??? Please. He did hit behind the head a couple of times due to Hopkins' dirty tactics, but not even close to the dirtiness of Joe. Just reading the statement shows how ridiculous it is.
    As far as Cortez is concerned, my man MGUNZ 48 said it right, a Cortex fight is a Cortez show and always a worse fight than it could have been. A ref is supposed to do what he can to let the boxers fight, not whatever it is that Cortez does.
    I was hoping to see a better fight than I saw from both fighters. Hopkins looked in shape, sure, but he didn't fight like it, and Joe couldn't get free from Hopkins b.s. enough for it to be a good show.
    If anybody deserved a split decision, though, we should all agree it was Glen Johnson and not Bernard Hopkins.
     
  3. thoughtmc007

    thoughtmc007 New Member Full Member

    24
    0
    Apr 19, 2008
    I meant dirtiness of Hopkins...
     
  4. KobeIsGod

    KobeIsGod Who Necks?!? Full Member

    7,318
    6
    Jan 7, 2007
    fair enough. that's better wording. he played it for all it was worth. not saying it wasnt an intelligent move but coupled with his low workate and holding, it didnt make him look any better

    looks like i might have to retract that last statement :yep

    What is wrong with this guy? Does he sit in the nose-bleed section or is someone always blocking his view?
     
  5. Club Fighter

    Club Fighter Boxing Addict banned

    4,329
    1
    Oct 12, 2005
    Ridiculous my balls, dude. That **** makes perfect ****in' sense. Get the **** outta here with that "sense of urgency" bull****. Enzo Calzaghe finished Joe C's water bottle for chrissakes because he was so struck with anxiety over what he perceived to be Joe C's impending loss.

    This is so ****in' ******ed. dude. I tell people all the time on this board about reading comprehension yet it never seems to sink in. To hear me talk you cannot draw the conclusion that you did but I'll give you the conclusion that you should have drawn. I'll help you out by underlining key words. Now if the total amount of "punches" which Joe is alleged to have landed cannot accumulatively produce any signs of damage whatsoever then simple logic would lead one to believe that Joe either A) didn't land as many punches as we believe to be the case or B) he's a straight up B-I-itch. Either way, it ain't good to be Joe.

    You gotta be kidding me. So that's what Joe wanted to do? He wanted to get hit with right hands in the kisser and then retaliate with furious (mostly errant) slaps all night?

    Actually I don't have a man, thank you very much. I'm heterosexual, yet if I did have a man rest assured it wouldn't be Hopkins. This is where you're wrong, jagoff, I'm not a Hopkins fan. I'm a boxing fan. I just don't understand how a slapper can get up off the canvas and net a 116-111 victory in a fight in which he was the only party that was hurt.

    This I don't even wanna dignify with a response.

    When a 175 lb man puches one in the face as many times as Joe is allleged to have done, generally speaking, you'll notice it on the recipients face. Now read back that first sentence and this time substitute the word "man" with "World Champion Boxer" and you'll see what I mean.

    And I also wasn't aware that slaps were awarded any points at all.

    Thanks for your contribution.

    I applaud you. There are many students in the Helen Keller institute who only wish they could say the same.

    FH did, too, but that got edited out of my original post cuz you're not allowed to say FH at ESB.

    I'll give you that. It would have been nice if he had decided to shut the **** up a little.
     
  6. tays001

    tays001 ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    15,124
    7
    Mar 6, 2006
    Somebody is Bitter:yep :yep :yep

    JC won that is all
     
  7. Drexl

    Drexl Your Hero Full Member

    4,427
    1
    Jan 24, 2005

    ...is all I see.
     
  8. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    Make some sense when you respond to my posts or don't bother. You could at least have the common courtesy to respond to each post separately so when we respond in kind other posters will know what the **** we're talking about.

    Maybe you worship what supposed boxing experts write but I respect my own eyes quite a bit more. I don't need some 2 bit Kellerman or Raphael telling what I saw. Slaps or no slaps, those shots landed at a rate that was around 100 more than what your fighter landed so **** off.
     
  9. Drexl

    Drexl Your Hero Full Member

    4,427
    1
    Jan 24, 2005
    Those who believe they know better than everyone else and think they can judge a person's experience in the sport based on their scoring of a single close fight = ****WITS.

    :finger
     
  10. Club Fighter

    Club Fighter Boxing Addict banned

    4,329
    1
    Oct 12, 2005
    Dude, if you've met your match don't try to pretend as if you're high and mighty, just admit it. It's classier that way. And this "internet etiquette" nonsense . . . LOL, please, stop while you still have some dignity left. Outside of it being stupid, it's pathetic. You're really grasping at straws here. Like I said earlier, just admit it. You posted something weak, got a response you couldn't handle, and are desperately trying to play it off. Don't worry, I won't tell anyone. Your secret's safe with me. ;)

    Tell me when I said I worshipped what "boxing experts" write. I just showed whomever wished to see who some of the people were who saw things 114-113 Hopkins. Never did I say their opinion was more important than yours or mine, but let's be honest if I had changed the thread title to "114-113 so says Club Fighter, Titi Ni Hoya, kilon22 and more" prospective posters would have responded at most with, "So, who the **** are you three?" Don't blame me. Blame those who get duped by name/brand recognition.

    P.S. And you conveniently neglected the fact that I included the results of a public poll as well. This was never just about the "boxing experts."

    Oh, yeah. You say "slaps or no slaps," well let me just reiterate the fact that zero points are awarded for slaps both thrown and/or landed.

    Toodles, cupcake. :hi:
     
  11. Drexl

    Drexl Your Hero Full Member

    4,427
    1
    Jan 24, 2005
    Surely you are intelligent enough to realize that Calzaghe's punches have been labelled "slaps" due to their lack of power and the wierd arching motion that Joe naturally uses when throwing fast combinations.

    They are NOT the open-hand slaps that are typically ignored when scoring. Calzaghe's combination punches carry practically no individual power, but they are legit scoring blows.

    Zero points are what you award for feints with no actual punch thrown, for faking low blows, for rubbing oyur forehead in your opponent's face, for trapping your opponents off-side arm in your armpit and for clinching. :deal
     
  12. daredevil1989

    daredevil1989 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,177
    1
    Dec 9, 2007
    fairly accurate assessment most the guys at the bar i watched it at got excited by those crowd pleasing flurries but anyone with a critical eye sees he wasnt landing. I think people like myself who think hopkins won appreciate the subtleties and clean punching
     
  13. nervousxtian

    nervousxtian Trolljegeren Full Member

    14,049
    1,098
    Aug 6, 2005
    Actually, there are no points awarded for any punch thrown. At the end of the round the "round" itself is scored on the main criterias they go over before every fight.

    This whole "scoring" blow nonsense is an attempt to make amateur boxers look better, that's how amateur boxing is scored, not pros.

    In the pros, one good clean hard shot can sway a round, that's how it works. Defense is also scored, effective punching, ring generalship, etc.

    Joe landing a bunch of pitty-pat shots obviously won him the fight, there's just us out here who didn't think that was enough to win a good majority of the rounds.

    I'll say it again, Hopkins lost this fight more than Joe won it, because the rounds in which I scored for Joe were more-so from the inactivity of Hopkins than from any actual effective fighting from Joe.
     
  14. Drexl

    Drexl Your Hero Full Member

    4,427
    1
    Jan 24, 2005
    One or two flashy shots don't offset a round of consistant punches, no matter how "light" those punches are.
     
  15. TanstA

    TanstA Legendary Full Member

    1,428
    0
    Mar 13, 2007
    and all of those people are smoking some mean glass dick

    when i heard that score from the first judge i almost died of disgust.