114-113 Hopkins, so says the Associated Press, ESPN.com and many ESBers.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Club Fighter, Apr 20, 2008.


  1. gruuby

    gruuby CONFIRMED FOR BRAWL Full Member

    785
    0
    Mar 5, 2006
    Please, this is the proving ground here and nothing you say will change that. Epic fail.
     
  2. Dirty Bastard

    Dirty Bastard Dirty As Hell Full Member

    1,587
    1
    Jan 19, 2008
    :patsch ......nothing to say to my response then eh ****wit!!!?
     
  3. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    You're right, nothing I can say, and nothing you can say, can change the FACT that Calzaghe beat Hopkins.
     
  4. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    No, nothing other than wondering if your soap is providing a good interest rate?
     
  5. gruuby

    gruuby CONFIRMED FOR BRAWL Full Member

    785
    0
    Mar 5, 2006
    I guess we agree on something. But then you'd have to be ******ed to question facts, no?
     
  6. Dirty Bastard

    Dirty Bastard Dirty As Hell Full Member

    1,587
    1
    Jan 19, 2008
    Your 100% right....on paper Calzaghe beat Hopkins................WELL DONE YOU!!!!
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    Undeservedly & through slapping though!!!!
    :rofl
     
  7. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    You'd have to be ******ed to claim Calzaghe failed epically in his attempt to beat Hopkins, right Pfeiffer? :yep
     
  8. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    gee, sometimes you come over like an objective Calzaghe supporter, other times you come over like just another biased yank :hey
     
  9. standing 8countboxing

    standing 8countboxing Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,472
    1
    Feb 22, 2005
    I found a website that judges the fights it 60 percent gave it to Calzhage, 30 to B-hop and 10 percent draw. I scored it for Joe Cal by a few points. Will watch again though
     
  10. Dirty Bastard

    Dirty Bastard Dirty As Hell Full Member

    1,587
    1
    Jan 19, 2008
    That statement was objective....Just hope Joe can impress next time (NOT FIGHTING ROY JONES)
     
  11. gruuby

    gruuby CONFIRMED FOR BRAWL Full Member

    785
    0
    Mar 5, 2006
    Wrong fool, he failed to impress and win in a convincing fashion. He didn't fail epically like you claim in your silly islander speak. Reather, it was an epic fail.
     
  12. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    Hey fool :hey

    Whatever Calzaghe was attempting to do, he achieved it - he now has RJJ chasing him for a big $$$ fight, and he now has all the ******s like yourself talking about how easy he will be to beat.

    LINE EM UP!!!!!! :lol:

    IF IT MAKES DOLLAZ, IT MAKES SENSE :yep
     
  13. gruuby

    gruuby CONFIRMED FOR BRAWL Full Member

    785
    0
    Mar 5, 2006
    Try Euros, dollars ain't worth **** right now. Also RJJ is not gonna beat Joe, please.

    *EDIT*
    In retrospect you're right if he gets the figh with rjj -- he will be a big winner after all.
     
  14. Ziggy Montana

    Ziggy Montana The Butcher Full Member

    3,605
    0
    Oct 3, 2007
    Semi-landed slaps count as landed punches, hence the wide gap between JC and B-Hop in terms of punchstats. On the other hand, B-Hop landed the cleanest punches as JC was walking right into the right-hand lead in the early rounds.

    I had it for Calzaghe, reluctantly, as his workrate exceeded B-Hop's ring cleverness and counterpunch accuracy.
     
  15. BoxingGuru

    BoxingGuru Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,458
    3
    Jan 21, 2007
    Calzaghe won, end of story. Bernard lunged in and potshotted and held the whole night. It was the worst display of boxing since Ruiz/McCline.