115-113 cards are reasonable for Pac-Tim and i will tell you why

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PR BOXING, Jun 12, 2012.


  1. PR BOXING

    PR BOXING Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,669
    12
    Feb 4, 2010
    Pacquiao won. But anything further than 116-112 for pac is biased or maybe the person is ignorant to how to score a fight properly

    Do you think you can follow a fighter and do nothing for 2:30 minutes of some rounds and throw 2 flurrys at the end to get a crowd reaction even tho most of the punches might not even landed and deserve to win the round??? NOPE

    unfortunately people only remember what happens in the last minute

    ring generalship, jabs, body shots and just being active scores. . . .:deal
     
  2. Leon

    Leon The Artful Dodger Full Member

    40,234
    13
    Mar 14, 2010
    That's how I had it. 116-112 for emmanuel

    Rounds 1, 10, 11, and 12 to Timmeh
     
  3. blitzco

    blitzco Englishism Full Member

    344
    0
    Feb 3, 2010
    Big punches in your face also scores.

    This content is protected
     
  4. Leon

    Leon The Artful Dodger Full Member

    40,234
    13
    Mar 14, 2010
    emmanuel fought with a sense of entitlement and even lost all the championship rounds. I'm starting to think he was in on the fix too.
     
  5. PinoyProdigy

    PinoyProdigy Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,850
    14,075
    Jul 30, 2011
    118-110 Pacquiao. Closes I could have seen it is 116-112 for Pacquiao.
     
  6. errsta

    errsta Boxing Addict banned

    6,321
    1
    Jul 31, 2004
    Agreed.

    Ridiculous commentating and crowd noise for missed punches aside, of course.
     
  7. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    that means 5 rounds for bradley. giving 4 rounds to bradley was quite generous when his only clear round is the 10th. pac dominated bradley for a long stretch that is rounds 3 to 9. are you giving all rounds 1-2 and rounds 10-12 for bradley?
     
  8. luy32

    luy32 Guest

    I think he was told to make it close, as they had the rematch lined up already.. :think
     
  9. Bladegunner

    Bladegunner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,424
    4
    Jun 18, 2010
    The irony, people said the same thing last november about pac:lol:
     
  10. PR BOXING

    PR BOXING Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,669
    12
    Feb 4, 2010
    ok i hear you but i don't like the fact that all the close rounds MUST go to the popular fighter without hezitation and thats not right

    anyway, round 1 could have gone either way although pac landed the strongest punch in the round and i gave round 2 to tim
     
  11. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    pac-bradley was not even close to pac-jmm3. pac-jmm3 have so many close rounds that it can be seen the other way around. the only close rounds for this fight are 2, 11 and 12.
     
  12. undefeated

    undefeated FIMP Full Member

    368
    0
    Jan 24, 2005
    And those people were ****ing idiots such as yourself :hi:

    Pac won that fight, close...sure, but pac deserved the win
     
  13. Nopporn

    Nopporn Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    1,741
    Jan 4, 2007
    ^
    This:good
     
  14. PR BOXING

    PR BOXING Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,669
    12
    Feb 4, 2010
    but this thread is just for the sake of debating scorecards but we all know that they don't matter because Snake Arum desperately wants to make Timmy the new star because he fears Manny will and should leave his ass in 2013. Thats all

    I don't think its a fix Leon, i think its a screwjob
     
  15. Bladegunner

    Bladegunner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,424
    4
    Jun 18, 2010
    :lol:

    Voted robbery of the year and you calling people idiots.

    The writers scorecards you jokers are posting for validating a pac win are the exact same people who scored the november fight for marquez. I guess they're idiots to:rofl:rofl

    Priceless