116-11 Cotto Judge should NEVER score another fight in his life

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by swedeone, Jun 13, 2009.


Page 2 of 2
  1. swedeone

    swedeone Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,227
    3
    Dec 4, 2004


    What? :shock:

    114-113 Clottey is "bad" and nothing on 116-111 Cotto?


    Pa-leeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeze! :-(
     
    swedeone, Jun 13, 2009
    swedeone, Jun 13, 2009
    #16
  2. Ilesey

    Ilesey ~ Full Member

    38,201
    2,600
    Jul 22, 2004
    I had Cotto winning the fight. It was close but a clear win for Cotto. 114-113 is a terrible score in my honest opinion.
     
    Ilesey, Jun 13, 2009
    Ilesey, Jun 13, 2009
    #17
  3. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    Agree, no fighter should get a score of only 11 in a 12 round fight.
     
    PATSYS, Jun 13, 2009
    PATSYS, Jun 13, 2009
    #18
  4. nickthegreek

    nickthegreek Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,538
    1
    Aug 29, 2006
    116-111 is a ****ing disgrace.

    I had Cotto winning the fight by 1 point.
     
    nickthegreek, Jun 13, 2009
    nickthegreek, Jun 13, 2009
    #19
  5. Drunkenboxer

    Drunkenboxer Least Eligible Bachelor Full Member

    60
    6
    May 12, 2006
    I'm pretty much with the status quo here, strongly believe that Cotto snatched it and deserved the nod, but idiotic scores like this just **** it up and alienate people from the sport...
     
    Drunkenboxer, Jun 13, 2009
    Drunkenboxer, Jun 13, 2009
    #20
  6. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,442
    Jun 30, 2005
    That's a new term. I'll start calling things a "Eugenia score" or a "Jo Jo Guerra (118 SRL 110 Hagler) score"
     
    Thread Stealer, Jun 13, 2009
    Thread Stealer, Jun 13, 2009
    #21
  7. Sugarshorts

    Sugarshorts I've got a Full Member Full Member

    110
    0
    Nov 18, 2005
    I don't know if anyone else will, but from now on, that's what I'll call it when I see it. "Jo Jo" reared its ugly head tonight.
     
    Sugarshorts, Jun 13, 2009
    Sugarshorts, Jun 13, 2009
    #22
  8. paulfv

    paulfv Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,853
    0
    Jul 7, 2007
    Definitely. Lifetime ban in order.

    It's like that one WACK judge who had Cunningham like 115-112 over Adamek or whatever. That was freaking embarrassing. BAN
     
    paulfv, Jun 13, 2009
    paulfv, Jun 13, 2009
    #23
  9. RingKing

    RingKing Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,018
    623
    Feb 21, 2008
    This coming from someone who has an avatar of a fighter who is used to getting gifts from the judges against JMM. Not surprised at all by your comments. Let me guess. The knockdown was the difference in the fight, right? :-(
     
    RingKing, Jun 13, 2009
    RingKing, Jun 13, 2009
    #24
  10. heehoo

    heehoo TIMEXICAH! Full Member

    3,763
    13
    Feb 16, 2008
    Agreed.
     
    heehoo, Jun 13, 2009
    heehoo, Jun 13, 2009
    #25
  11. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,120
    2,760
    Jul 20, 2004
    Got to agree, idiotic scoring that was.
     
    Scar, Jun 13, 2009
    Scar, Jun 13, 2009
    #26
  12. mightyd40

    mightyd40 Spartan Full Member

    2,264
    13
    Mar 21, 2007
    sorry, i had the same score....the close rounds were close and i am not against different scores but this isnt an outrageous scorecard
     
    mightyd40, Jun 13, 2009
    mightyd40, Jun 13, 2009
    #27
Page 2 of 2