I dont need to re-read what you wrote. I know you never said never. I just said that I think you may have confused them with another organisation I was thinking of. You said they had little opp to unify unless they dropped the belt. I said I can think of several unifications around that time. Maybe you should re-read what I said
I wasn't confusing them with anyone Bailey. And ONCE AGAIN, I know it happened , just wan't common at all.
Robin Reid really could have had taken the 0s of both calzaghe and Ottke. he should have definitely taken Ottkes but history tells a different story unfortunately.
You know what happened? You made the statement. Not me. I just said I think you may be thinking of another organisation. I also said I could think of several unifications of that title from those years back. As said. You made the statement, so im not sure what you are trying to debate here? Can you show me your source. I would be interested to read and I will try and find the source to who I felt you were referring to I was thinking possibly WBA as I recall Vasquez not keeping the title before the Hamed fight
So you couldnt argue with what I wrote. Once again, I picked you up for your statements and you run when called out. Good lad. Move on
I think Calzaghe beat Reid and clearly in a tough fight. If that makes sense, though do think Reid landed the punch of the fight, which most of us remember. I think Reid was treated badly against Ottke. Though that really was a past best Ottke
he could have beat calzaghe. But came up slightly short. we can all agree, past best or not, Reid was the rightful winner. But Ottke is severely underrated.
You're too obtuse and dense FFS.... You saying you recall unification w/ a WBO belt doesn't add anything, as I said is HAD happened, just wasn't too common.
There was no point. You were essentially repeating WHAT I SAID. Except you seem to think unifying w/ a WBO belt was as easy as it is today.