168 rankings; who is #1

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by unclepaulie, Apr 28, 2009.


  1. unclepaulie

    unclepaulie Run like an antelope! Full Member

    6,002
    1
    Aug 14, 2007
    I have Froch. In dismantling Pascal and then beating Taylor, his stock rises to #1 for me, with Bute having unfinished business with Librado Andrade and Kessler stuck under the thumbscrews of Mogens Palle. What does your top ten look like?

    1. Froch
    2. Kessler
    3. Bute
    4. Andrade
    5. Bika
    6. Green
    7. Taylor
    8. Berrio
    9. Balszay
    10. Miranda


    There is also an excellent group of #11-17 or 18 fighters too who will keep this group honest.
     
  2. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    Kessler is a lot better than Froch. He has a better guard, better jab, more speed, doesn't throw his chin up in the air, can slip punches, doesn't swing wildly, has just as much power etc. Froch beat Pascal by a couple of rounds, and he was 14 seconds away from getting embarrassed by Taylor. It's not as if he's done a job on the division! In any case, Pascal wasn't a guy with great enough credentials to merit top place.

    Kessler vs. Froch would look like Kessler vs. Andrade II, but with a stoppage.
     
  3. THN

    THN Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,386
    0
    Apr 8, 2007
    Kessler
    Andrade
    Froch
    Bute
    Taylor
    Green
    Bika
    Sartison
    Direll
    Ward
     
  4. unclepaulie

    unclepaulie Run like an antelope! Full Member

    6,002
    1
    Aug 14, 2007
    All fair points, and I would install Kessler as a huge favorite against Froch, but it just comes down to the fact that Froch is willing to do what needs to be done and fight dangerous contenders while Kessler is sitting on a title, managerial problems or not.
     
  5. THN

    THN Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,386
    0
    Apr 8, 2007
    Sitting on a title ? He was willing to travel to Wales with the WBC and WBA belts against Calzaghe.
     
  6. unclepaulie

    unclepaulie Run like an antelope! Full Member

    6,002
    1
    Aug 14, 2007
    And he has done (x) since then. Seriously, I'm not hating on Kessler, but his last notable fight was a loss to Joe "Mother****in'" Calzaghe. For my money, Froch is the #1 guy at 168; he is willing to go and fight anyone, and he can win in late rounds. That goes a long way with this American.
     
  7. THN

    THN Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,386
    0
    Apr 8, 2007
    So is Kessler and thats the problem his promotor, he will/can't get him the big fights, so Kessler is trying to get rid of him. Is it hard to understand?
     
  8. unclepaulie

    unclepaulie Run like an antelope! Full Member

    6,002
    1
    Aug 14, 2007

    Until he does, it's Froch for me.
     
  9. Maxime

    Maxime Sweet Science Full Member

    8,957
    109
    Jul 19, 2004
    01- Kessler (WBA)
    02- Bute (IBF)
    03- Froch (WBC)
    04- Andrade
    05- Taylor
    06- Bika (IBO)
    07- Balzsay (WBO)
    08- Dirrell
    09- Ward
    10- Pascal
     
  10. THN

    THN Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,386
    0
    Apr 8, 2007
    Fair enough, but he's actually trying to do something about it :good
     
  11. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    The Pascal fight was very close, no a 'dismantling' IMO.

    I have Froch at 3, behind Bute and Kessler (kessler at no.1 obviously)
     
  12. unclepaulie

    unclepaulie Run like an antelope! Full Member

    6,002
    1
    Aug 14, 2007
    Until he does, I have to back the guy taking the tougher fights.
     
  13. Wordup

    Wordup Big Stiff Idiot Full Member

    1,644
    2
    Oct 20, 2008
    Yep and thats great news, but based on recent fights Froch makes a good case for the #1 spot.

    I'm a bigger fan of Kessler than I am of Froch, and think Kessler would beat him quite handily.
     
  14. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    Agreed, but does having a big girl's blouse of a promoter really make you a worse boxer P4P?
     
  15. unclepaulie

    unclepaulie Run like an antelope! Full Member

    6,002
    1
    Aug 14, 2007
    No, but winning the bigger fights against the better known and obviously more fitting boxers, like I said before, goes a long way in my book.