Spinks' jab is good enough to keep it close, and his power would probably have some effect on Tunney at some point. Maybe it wouldn't score a stoppage, but I can see the Fighting Marine being badly shaken and becoming a bit more cautious, allowing the Jinx to close strong enough to earn a close UD.
I like Spinks, but Tunney was never really unleashed as a LH 'cause he was fighting back a heavyweight poundage when he was the best out there. In his fight against Carpentier for instance he was very weakened. I think Tunney takes his physical strength to Spink's and puts the awkward fighter on the back foot to some effective lock n' poppin' over 15. Tunney has the chin here ya see.
Tunney by decision. Both guys are fast but Tunney is less aggressive, meaning that Spinks will try to get off first and Tunney just does not get hit by straight punches (which is what Spinks throws 99% of the time). Tunney will counterpunch and win the early rounds, and then wins the later rounds because of his great stamina (and because Spinks will have used up more energy).
:rofl:rofl One of the first ever vids i had of wrestling, it was a two-casette box, i remember i lost part 2 early when i was really young and it's never found. They were the days.
I'll side with the Spinks crowd for this one. A match like this would be close, but based on what I've seen, I have to give it Michael.
I say Tunney frustrates Spinks early on and takes the first three or four rounds. His ability to circle Spinks right hand and pepper him with jabs and dart in and out throwing uppercuts are going to, at times, literally stun Spinks. But as the fight goes on Spinks will stop probing with the jab and explode. Both men threw good sharp uppercuts on the inside, but I think the power (in both hands) clearly lies with Spinks here. Tunney was never stopped. I think Spinks will be the aggressor late on and can find Tunney with either hand as Spinks was a fantastic body puncher IMO and would've slowed him down. I give Tunney the benefit of the doubt and say he survives, but at Light-Heavy Spinks' power was on a par with Dempseys at heavy IMO, and he also has the benefit of pretty much half a century of advancements. Spinks PTS Tunney 7-5 No KD's, but Spinks being the clear victor, Tunney barely hanging on at the end.
Tunney was too fast, focused and disciplined for him to roll over and be beaten by Spinks as though he were a Steffan Tangstad or a sloppy, shot Gerry Cooney. There even existed over his wins over Holmes the shadow of doubt....Tunney forever remains the most underrated heavy champ..even Ezzard Charles gets more regard. Tunney would be accurate with that jab and solid right hand of his, and would have been too smart to be "jinxed". Spinks was great at lightheavyweight, but Tunney would have him at heavyweight.
What I left out was most relevant, and that was the fact that Tunney had a world class chin..even if he was hit by Spinks, chances are he would take it, or, if hurt, would have the presence of mind to get on his bike like he did with Dempsey until all was clear...Tunney by a decision.
Tunney's fast feet give him the edge here ,coupled with the fact he had underated power in his right , he takes a close decision here from the awkwardly effective Spinks.