175 lineal kingpin is back on tonight.

I guess David Haye if it wasn't stripped..

 

Both Haye and Naseem got whooped though when fighting for IBO..


And Lennox never fought Wladimir..

 

But why do people call fighters "lineal" just because they win the ring title??


Isn't that like Crawford @ 140


Ring is just another ABC..


You still have to win 3 or 4 belts first.. the standard being 4 now maybe.. the IBO might not mean that much yet..

 

lmfao

 

That's good to hear.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

 

Really Roy was the real WBC champion.. and IBO champion.. so Dariusz never really unified..

The WBC stripped Roy too.. didn't they?


And Crawford is the lineal champion @ 140 just because he unified Ring/WBC/WBO?? That shouldn't be right..

 

What about Broner/Burns and Eduard Troyanovsky?

 

I can't wait to watch the kingpimp back in action

 

All these fighters might have been #1 in the division but lineal should mean WBA-WBC-IBF or WBA-WBC-IBF-WBO..


Is GGG the new lineal champion now? Or does he need to fight Canelo or Saunders??

 

I guess Canelo is only still active.. you can be lineal and run.. or lineal and be stripped..


I'd favour GGG because Canelo didn't pursue @ 160..