18 and 1. way to ruin the super 6

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Anglosaxon, Oct 18, 2009.


Page 3 of 8
  1. Anglosaxon

    Anglosaxon FASTEST HANDS ON ESB Full Member

    8,521
    139
    Jul 21, 2008
    I notice most people didnt score the fight, but decided Dirrel won because of the last 3 rounds.... well the 10th round, it was 9-9, and before that, for much t of the fight, Froch shaded each round bar 1, if peopel legitimately scored the fight, Froch won by some distance.

    You don't wins rounds for showing examples of text book defence and no offence.

    Dirrel won 3-4 rounds of the fight, and 2 of those were the last 2 rounds.
     
    Anglosaxon, Oct 18, 2009
    Anglosaxon, Oct 18, 2009
    #31
  2. Anglosaxon

    Anglosaxon FASTEST HANDS ON ESB Full Member

    8,521
    139
    Jul 21, 2008

    Sorry I see no video or Gif... I just see anti Froch people talking nonsense.

    Froch was not hurt, if Froch was hurt, then in the 8th Dirrel was KO'ed.
     
    Anglosaxon, Oct 18, 2009
    Anglosaxon, Oct 18, 2009
    #32
  3. valdez

    valdez Grand Champ Full Member

    2,197
    0
    Jul 4, 2007
    I'm just pointing out you seem to be the only one who didn't see him wobble..

    Froch barely landed all night.. He spent it chasing, punching the air and getting landed on every now and then..

    Thats not a winning performance in my eyes..
     
    valdez, Oct 18, 2009
    valdez, Oct 18, 2009
    #33
  4. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007

    Do you win rds by plodding and missing ? Because thats what Froch did !! Its not like he was out landing Dirrell ..I had it 115 -113 in favor of Dirrell ,,Froch wasn't busy enough or landed effective enough to deserve that decision ..In the later rds Andre was tagging him at will ..A true sign of ring generalship ..What Froch's bad footwork and come forward style was more effective ??
     
    Imperial1, Oct 18, 2009
    Imperial1, Oct 18, 2009
    #34
  5. One Round

    One Round Hertfordshire's Finest Full Member

    2,964
    15
    Nov 24, 2008
    I agree entirely. Totally wrong game plan. If he'd fought like he did in the last 2-3 rounds throughout the whole fight he most probably would've walked it.
     
    One Round, Oct 18, 2009
    One Round, Oct 18, 2009
    #35
  6. Anglosaxon

    Anglosaxon FASTEST HANDS ON ESB Full Member

    8,521
    139
    Jul 21, 2008

    Again, why was Dirrel the one with the marked face and blood if he was the only one that was landing?

    Yes Dirrel won teh final 2 rounds, would have been 3, but the point deduction, try scoring the fight before round 11.

    Froch was not hurt at all, his legs didn't stiffen, he walked calmly back, when a fighter gets hurt, they have indecision, they don't reat fast enough and get tagged again, this didn't happen:patsch

    Eating jabs, jabbing on teh gloves of Froch, getting chased around, sliding,hugging, bowing and crying isn't winning in my book. As I said, don't score the fight from rounds 11 and 12.
     
    Anglosaxon, Oct 18, 2009
    Anglosaxon, Oct 18, 2009
    #36
  7. radab

    radab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,721
    1
    Dec 14, 2008


    one of the worst non-troll posts i've read in a long time
     
    radab, Oct 18, 2009
    radab, Oct 18, 2009
    #37
  8. Anglosaxon

    Anglosaxon FASTEST HANDS ON ESB Full Member

    8,521
    139
    Jul 21, 2008
    If he fought like that in rounds 11 and 12.. he'd have gassed out, or been tagged earlier by Froch, saying something like that is dumb, because there are so many factors that change the fight, Froch would have warmed up to those tactics too, he always takes a while to get going as he works people out.
     
    Anglosaxon, Oct 18, 2009
    Anglosaxon, Oct 18, 2009
    #38
  9. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,058
    6,275
    Jan 22, 2009
    Maybe because Barrera might have learned it from classless Hamed as mr.overrated was known to do it,too.
     
    Clinton, Oct 18, 2009
    Clinton, Oct 18, 2009
    #39
  10. Anglosaxon

    Anglosaxon FASTEST HANDS ON ESB Full Member

    8,521
    139
    Jul 21, 2008
    Mr Overated? :patsch
     
    Anglosaxon, Oct 18, 2009
    Anglosaxon, Oct 18, 2009
    #40
  11. Tuavale

    Tuavale Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,703
    3
    Mar 16, 2007
    :good:good
     
    Tuavale, Oct 18, 2009
    Tuavale, Oct 18, 2009
    #41
  12. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    44
    Sep 6, 2008
    If anybody thinks that Dirrell did anything other than fight an intelligent, controlled, skilled night then they shouldn't be watching boxing. What you saw wasn't "negativity": it was Dirrell giving a defensive masterclass and constantly beating Froch to the punch on the outside. He landed the cleaner, harder shots all the way.

    This, gentlemen, was a robbery.
     
    itrymariti, Oct 18, 2009
    itrymariti, Oct 18, 2009
    #42
  13. valdez

    valdez Grand Champ Full Member

    2,197
    0
    Jul 4, 2007
    you think Dirrell was eating jabs?.. :rofl:rofl:rofl

    I rest my case..
     
    valdez, Oct 18, 2009
    valdez, Oct 18, 2009
    #43
  14. EpsilonAxis

    EpsilonAxis HNIC Full Member

    6,491
    2
    Jul 24, 2004
    It was an ugly fight.
     
    EpsilonAxis, Oct 18, 2009
    EpsilonAxis, Oct 18, 2009
    #44
  15. Tuavale

    Tuavale Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,703
    3
    Mar 16, 2007

    Do you disagree with everything I said or just portions of it? Which part specifically?
     
    Tuavale, Oct 18, 2009
    Tuavale, Oct 18, 2009
    #45
Page 3 of 8