1899 Tom Sharkey vs 1950 Rex Layne

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SuzieQ49, Apr 24, 2011.


  1. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,725
    Sep 14, 2005
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJP3UXzLPTg[/ame]
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJ2wniRyAo0&feature=related[/ame]
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKUlBPErrn0&feature=related[/ame]
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pj2jOpoecfc[/ame]

    This content is protected

    Rex Layne 6'1 200lb
    This content is protected

    Tom Sharkey 5'8 180lb


    Who wins? who has the better career wins?
     
  2. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,523
    27,102
    Feb 15, 2006
    Tough call on the best career wins.

    They are both among the elite list of contenders with two or more wins over lineal heavyweight champions, though Sharkey's win over Fitzsimmons was bogus and Laynes win over Charles was questionable. They both lost to the best fighter of their era, though Sharkey put forth a better loosing effort.

    They both beat some good contenders,Sharkey (Ruhlin, Choynski, McCoy older Goddard), Layne (Tomphson Satterfield). Slight edge to Sharkey on depth.

    So slight edge to Sharkey overall, though Layne might have the better wins.

    Who would win head to head is harder to say. They were both fighters who could f**k it up against guys in eachothers class on the day. It would certainly have been an all action crowd pleasing fight with sombody getting stopped.
     
  3. Vic-JofreBRASIL

    Vic-JofreBRASIL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,482
    4,910
    Aug 19, 2010
    I wish there was more information on Tom.....
     
  4. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,404
    9,349
    Jul 15, 2008
    Sharkey by far.
     
  5. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,344
    Jun 29, 2007
    Layne is over rated. I think Sharkey stops him. For those who want to read more on Sharkey, I recommend Fighters I meet by Tom Sharkey.
     
  6. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    264
    Jul 22, 2004
    I think Layne knocks him out, Sharkey was easy to hit and Layne although a little crude if nothing else is a big puncher, he's also bigger, and a result of a better more competitive era
     
  7. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,565
    Nov 24, 2005
    I'd probably say Sharkey was better, and would win.
    Sharkey gave Jeffries two tough fights, and beat the crap out of Corbett.
    He looks like a hard ******* psychopath too, (with all due respect.)
     
  8. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004
    It certainly sounds like Sharkey was a bit of a wild fighter, and not too well liked. here is Sharkey v Choynski.

    http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F70C10F93D5C11738DDDAA0994DB405B8885F0D3

    and here is a write up for Sharkey v Goddard.
    http://news.google.com.au/newspaper...AJ&pg=7156,3819392&dq=tom+sharkey+fight&hl=en
    here is Sharkey v Ruhlin, which is an underated performance against a very good contender.

    http://news.google.com.au/newspaper...AJ&pg=2636,5113630&dq=tom+sharkey+fight&hl=en

    here is some of Sharkeys measurements. It also confirms that he bettered Corbett in a 4 rounder. It seems that Sharkey did have corbetts number.
    http://news.google.com.au/newspaper...IBAJ&pg=710,603424&dq=tom+sharkey+fight&hl=en

    Here is a Sharky Armstrong exhibition report. It doesnt say who won, but it is interesting that both were arrested for prize fighting.
    http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F10E15FA3B5F13718DDDAB0A94D9405B8985F0D3


    And here is the Sharkey Maher report, which was in the balance when policed decided to intervene.
    http://news.google.com.au/newspaper...AJ&pg=4937,5539007&dq=tom+sharkey+fight&hl=en

    This one isnt really relevant, but i thought it an interesting mention of one of the unkown boxers of the time who once fought Tom Sharkey.
    http://news.google.com.au/newspaper...AJ&pg=1699,3733177&dq=tom+sharkey+fight&hl=en

    Sullivan v sharkey is a good exhibition but it was an exhibition in the strictest sense of the word.

    http://news.google.com.au/newspaper...AJ&pg=5414,4302929&dq=tom+sharkey+fight&hl=en

    And here is an early description of the roughouse style of Tom Sharkey. I dont think it is really as comparable to Marciano, as most people seem to make out.

    http://news.google.com.au/newspaper...BAJ&pg=7020,744597&dq=tom+sharkey+fight&hl=en
     
  9. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,725
    Sep 14, 2005
  10. Vic-JofreBRASIL

    Vic-JofreBRASIL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,482
    4,910
    Aug 19, 2010
    Thank you boilermaker :good
     
  11. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004
    Do you have any contemporary opinions on Rex Layne, or fight descriptions similar to what i just posted for sharkey? It certainly seems that Sharkey has a huge edge in class based on the opponents he beat and his rating by contemporaries.
     
  12. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,725
    Sep 14, 2005
    Layne beat Jersey Joe Walcott and Ezzard Charles, who are better than anyone Tom Sharkey ever beat. I would argue the edge in class goes to Layne.

    Sure do


    Here is him being compared to Dempsey on his way up

    http://news.google.com/newspapers?i...=5212,3515381&dq=rex+layne+jack+dempsey&hl=en

    http://news.google.com/newspapers?i...=2325,4953097&dq=rex+layne+jack+dempsey&hl=en

    http://news.google.com/newspapers?i...=6061,4807713&dq=rex+layne+jack+dempsey&hl=en

    http://news.google.com/newspapers?i...=3984,2077926&dq=rex+layne+jack+dempsey&hl=en

    http://news.google.com/newspapers?i...=2258,3373883&dq=rex+layne+jack+dempsey&hl=en

    http://news.google.com/newspapers?i...INAAAAIBAJ&pg=5633,6636534&dq=rex+layne&hl=en
    Louis in high praise of layne

    http://news.google.com/newspapers?i...cDAAAAIBAJ&pg=6457,3903019&dq=rex+layne&hl=en
    Louis again

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5chxdyedNw[/ame]
    listen to announcer 1:15-1:25



    Layne coming up was compared to Jack Dempsey by some experts. He was always considered crude, but so was Sharkey. I think Layne and Sharkey are very evenly matched.


    "Throw out the record book on Layne, he was a rugged brawler with a quick, very heavy right. As he got shopworn and discouraged, more and more, he got outworked and beaten down.

    But, when he first raged out of Utah -- full of **** and vinegar -- he'd have been a handful for anybody. He could crack with that right."- John Garfield, ESBs boxing historian.



    "Layne looms as the outstanding prospect west of the
    Mississippi. He is a hard hitter... Layne has what it takes to be developed
    into the next world heavyweight king. He can hit and has an abundance of
    courage." -
    This content is protected




    This content is protected


    REX LAYNE, heavyweight challenger, had just added another victim to his collection. Bob Satterfield, Chicagoan, had been raining punches off Rex's cocoanut-like noggin all night. The cherubic-faced Mormon from Lewiston, Utah, fondeled the sore spots. Satterifeld had been laid to rest in 2:56 of the eighth canto when Mark Conn, the arbiter, halted the contest with Bob helples from a short right to the jaw.
    The bout had been an even-steven affair up to the knockout, although Layne had received all his punches in one locality- the cephalic, or, as the inmates of Stillman's Gym would have it, the kisser.
    It was suggested right after the contest that Rex had youth, strength, could take and give it, had showed improvement in his boxing form since his last two Garden appearances against Jersey Joe Walcott and Cesar Brion, respectively, but that he was still green and needed much seasoning in the technique of boxing.
    Marvin Jensen, the mink-raising guardian of Layne's ring fortunes, rushed to the defense. "He can box a lot better than he has shown since coming East. Did you see that boy punch? Ole Rex here sure has what it takes. He's full of fight.
    "Yeah," someone said, "but how long will he be full of fight if he doesn't learn how to protect himself better?"
    Rex interrupted: "A couple more fights like this and I'll be playing marbles," he quipped.
    Regardless of his record, an enviable on of 32 fights with only one loss, that to Dave Whitlock whom he defeated in two other outings, it is clear that Rex will have his greatest trouble with fast men who can move around. He won't lose anything by picking up a little more polish in the finer points of boxing.

    REX started his boxing career while a sergeant with the 187th Regiment of the 11th Airborne Division, located in the Asiatic theatre. He had enlisted in September, 1946, and was mustered out in March, 1948. In the interim, he won regimental and divisional titles. He came close to carrying home the bacon in the All-Japan tournaments in 1947 and 1948, and but a lad by the name of Howard Williams kept him from achieving that end.
    It wasn't until 1949 that Layne made the simon-pure "big time." In that year he won the National A.A.U. championship and a few months later turned professional. His amateur record stands at 26 fights, with only four losses.
    After Layne's unimpressive win over Cesar Brion we were visited by the mild-mannered, bashful, boyish Rex and his enthusiastic manager, Jensen.
    Jensen recounted the thrill in seeing the best of the breed come into its own; how he had thrilled in raising the best mink and now he was seeing "ole Rex" become a serious contender for heavyweight honors.
    It was less than two years ago that THE RING picked Layne as a comer, and he has kept faith by making the grade.
    A group had gathered and someone said, "Rex has a whale of a right, but why doesn't he use his left more?"
    Jensen jumped into the breach. "Ole Rex here has a dandy of a left hand but he injured it in an early fight and only recently has he started to develop it again."
    Rex cut in with: "That's right. My left is beginning to shape up again. I feel it in my gym workouts, and I'll be using it more as I go along."
    In his fight with Satterfield, Rex showed improvement with that left, and better boxing form, but he is still way off in ring science and unless he learns how to protect himself, how to avoid powerful wallops such as he got in the Satterfield bout, he'll fail to reach his objective. He's too wide open for punishment.

    JENSEN has been the butt of a great deal of criticism from New York scribes for the manner in which he has brought Layne along. His critics claim that his boy was too green for the likes of a Walcott; should never have been in with an awkward spoiler like Brion, and that Satterfield was too strong a puncher for the Utah youngster.
    "He's being fed to the lions," has been the cry. But Layne has defeated all three, and by so doing, he is now in a spot to demand recognition as a top challenger. After all, success is what counts, and Layne has come through with victories. His T.N.T. sock and courage have done that for him.
    Critics assert that Jensen has not had the experience in the pro league. Yes, he's developed a bevy of amateurs, but the manager of a big-time professional is different, has been the butt of the criticism.
    Well, Jensen had to take more chances than other managers or else not get any matches at all for Layne. He was up against it and has won out. The choices that he accepted have all worked out well for Layne, despite the fact that the opposition was exceedingly tough.
    Some claim that Layne must receive expert tutoring in boxing technique, tutorin that an old-timer must give. Well, Jensen has one of the best old-time managers in his corner in Joe Woodeman, former manager of Sam Langford, who should be able to advis properly.
    We recall a conversation with Jensen prior to Layne's fight with Walcott in which he stated that he wasn't advancing the easy way. "I'm sure Walcott can be beaten by Rex. I've studied the movies of his previous fights and I know what I'm doing. He continued: "There's too much picking of opponents today. If a man wants to be champ he must prove that right by fighting the best."
    Results talk, and Layne is up there, but we would like to see him taught more of the finer points. Continuing to take two to land one is likely to end as Layne himself stated: "A couple more fights like this and I'll be playing marbles."
    We were shooting the bull a few days prior to the Satterfield affair. Someone made a crack about how Layne looked too young to be of age.
    Joe Woodman said: "He'll be 23 in June." He turned to Layne, who was present. "Right?"
    Rex said: "I was born June 7, 1928."
    "What time?" someone joshed.
    Someone else cut in: "Did you ever do anything else but fight for a living?"
    "Sure," laughed Rex. "My father owns a farm in Lewiston and I worked on it until I went into the army."
    "Say, Rex," interrupted a bystander, "you're not married, are yuh?"
    --------- This goes into a lot of talk about Layne's family and whatever else, so I'll just cut to the end-------
    We asked Joe Woodman, who has been close to the youngster, what kind of boy he is.
    "A grand lad," said Joe. "He lives a clean life, trains hard and is a good family man-and don't forget... a darn good fighter."
    The last time we saw Layne was the day after his fight with Satterfield, when he was in THE RING office with Jensen.
    "What's you ambition?" Rex was asked.
    "What a question to ask a fighter," he countered. I want to be a champ and some day have a restaurant of my own like Jack Dempsey."
    Both Dempsey and Gene Tunney had seen Layne in his fight with Satterfield and were high on him. "Polish up his defense and you have a prospective champ," was their chorus.
     
  13. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,725
    Sep 14, 2005
    I think Layne and Sharkey were both strong, hard hitting, durable but very crude sluggers who loved to brawl and give there fans their money's worth. Both lacked defense, Layne had a much better jab, sharkey perhaps was the better infighter. I think this is a 50-50.
     
  14. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,404
    9,349
    Jul 15, 2008
    Youire leaving out that Sharkey was much better conditioned and far faster ...
     
  15. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,725
    Sep 14, 2005
    Sharkey was much better conditioned. We are in agreement. Layne did not like to train. I disagree on speed. I think Layne's hands were faster than sharkey's. Layne had deceptively quick hands and beat Charles and Walcott to the punch on occasion. From the film of Tom Sharkey vs Jeffries, his hands don't appear very fast.