1941 column by Jack Johnson published in The New York Times. (update - fake)

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by doug.ie, Apr 11, 2015.


  1. doug.ie

    doug.ie 'Classic Boxing Society' Full Member

    14,214
    80
    Apr 1, 2008
    i should have done that already...apologies.....changed now.
     
  2. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    411
    Jan 22, 2010
    Li'l Arthur is controversial still 100 years after he retired. Could you picture Jack Johnson with his verbiage against Ali's B.S. against B.S. ? Well I for one will take a Joe Louis and his dignity pitted against B.S. artists any day...
    Class wins in the end....In his day Joe Louis was more than respected he was LOVED...
     
  3. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. Full Member

    55,255
    10,363
    Jun 29, 2007
    Of corse you didn't bother to read the links. The truth can be poison for you.:hi:Your wife beating idol is bashing your 2nd favorite fighter, and also calling him a fouler. And not all of what he's saying is wrong.

    " If Dempsey fought me when I was in my prime I would have hung up my gloves if it went past nine rounds - Jack Johnson

    https://news.google.com/newspapers?...40,4893899&dq=jack+johnson+knocked+down&hl=en

    Johnson hit Willard plenty and could not hurt him in 26 rounds. Dempsey floored and hurt Willard early in round one.

    Then Johnson says Dempsey can't punch as it took him too long to finish opponents and uses examples of how Fitz or Jeffries Ko'd their man with one punch. Oddly enough Johnson did not mention Dempsey's destruction of Fulton in round one.