1951 Joe Louis vs 1993 George Foreman

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by choklab, Nov 8, 2017.


Who wins 1993 Foreman or 1951 Joe Louis

Poll closed Nov 22, 2017.
  1. I watched the 1951 fights and think Louis wins

    40.0%
  2. I watched Foremans 1993 fights and I think George wins

    60.0%
  1. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    Two fighters past their best but still capable at world level. How does this go?

    In 1949 joe Louis knocked out Elmer Ray, Pat Valentino, and Al Housman. He also beat contenders Johnny Shkor and Johnny Flynn in ten rounders. He also fought Rex Layne, Elmer Ray, Curtis hatchet man shepherd and Roscoe Toles. All these bouts were officially "exhibitions".

    In 1950 prior to meeting Charles joe Louis fought 26 "exhibitions" many of them quite serious like including knockout over Nino Valdes. He also met decent men omelio Agramante, Andy walker, Clarence Henry, Rex Layne, Henry Hill during these assignments. In an official fight he went ten rounds with tough contender Cesar Brionin November. This started an 8 fight 10 month run on the title.

    In 1951 joe Louis beat Cesar Brion a second time on points. The second time Louis looked very good. Louis Finished strong.

    He beat Omelio Agramante twice on points. He decked Agramante in one of those fights.

    He easily beat Jimmy Bivins who had been loosely called the interim HW champion during the war years.

    He knocked out top contender Lee Savold who had EU recognition as World champion as a rival to Ezzard Charles.

    He stopped recent world title challenger Freddie Beshore.

    And he stopped Andy Walker a big west coast heavyweight of only local interest.

    This content is protected


    This content is protected



    This content is protected


    After an incredible ten year break from boxing George Foreman started his comeback in 1987. He had 5 fights that year sensibly starting from the beginning he was not fighting name guys. In 1988 he fought 9 times, all knockouts, with only Dwight Qawi being remotely close to stepping up to a name fighter. In 1989 George fought five times mostly against former cruiserweight like Bert Cooper and Everett Martin who took him the distance. In 1990 George fought five times knocking out Gerry Cooney and Aldison Rodriguez. In 1991 George landed a title fit with Evander Holyfeild losing a competitive but clear decision loss on points. He had one other fight that year a TKO over an unranked Jimmy Ellis. George only had one fight in 1992 a tough disputed ten rounder against Alex Stewart who closed up and bruised George's face leading him to take 9 months off.

    In 1993 George had two good fights with rated men Tommy Morrison who beat George on points and Pierre Coetzer who he stopped quite impressively.

    This content is protected

    This content is protected
     
    reznick likes this.
  2. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    Pedro_El_Chef likes this.
  3. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    I didn’t know Louis fought all those guys in exhibitions. Really interesting.
     
  4. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    Yes he did. The Shkor fights were no decision with newspaper verdicts the next day. Elmer fought Louis a number of times. Nino Valdez was knocked out in one round. A full record of these contests can be found on the cyber boxing zone
     
    Mr.DagoWop and reznick like this.
  5. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    Seems like 51' Louis is regarded the same level as Comeback George after all.

    Folks seem split on who was better.
     
    Barberboy likes this.
  6. SolomonDeedes

    SolomonDeedes Active Member Full Member

    1,419
    2,228
    Nov 15, 2011
    Louis's record after his original retirement is solid, but let's not get carried away.

    He never knocked out Elmer Ray. He boxed three exhibitions with him. The first two went the distance and the third was a sad spectacle. Ray, knocked out by John Holman just a week before, shouldn't have been in the ring at all and barely put up a fight, quitting after the third round. His manager afterwards requested that the NBA withdraw his licence for his own safety and he never boxed again.

    Johnny Shkor and Johnny Flynn weren't contenders. Knocking out Nino Valdes in an exhibition sounds impressive, but at the time Valdes was an unknown part-timer whose attempt to make it in the US back in 48 had ended in defeat by 19-year-old Archie McBride.

    In his return to competitive boxing, Louis has two decisions over fringe contender Cesar Brion. A tko of Freddie Beshore - who had indeed been given a shot at Charles's title but only because Charles wanted an easy warm-up after a long break from the ring before his defence against Louis himself the following month. A decision over Jimmy Bivins - a famous name, but unranked by this time, having lost by a wider margin in his previous bout against Clarence Henry. And of course, a ko of Lee Savold - Louis did look good in this one, but Savold was a stationary target, 36 years old and clinging to his place in the top 10 despite having only one win in the last 3 years (on cuts, against Bruce Woodcock, after being pummeled).
     
    JohnThomas1 likes this.
  7. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,317
    11,711
    Mar 19, 2012
    I think their both hittable stationary targets at these stages in their respective careers. Prime for Prime I pick Joe to decapitate Foreman but I favor George on the senior tour. Based on his being healthy and having two good knockout punches in his arsenal. Meaning both hands. He was a two handed threat where Joe was getting by on his jab and experience strictly.
     
    choklab and BCS8 like this.
  8. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    They both appeared as rated contenders in Ring Magazine. Shkor was a headliner. He stopped Tami Mauriello.

    Nino had been boxing for nine years. He won important and thrilling fights in Cuba with Frederick Malibran.
    Caron Gonzalez, a well-known Cuban trainer remarked in an interview about Valdez: "Some said he lacked heart but he had plenty of heart. If you traded with him he would trade with you like he did with Malibran in those two wars and if he hit you right it was like brass knuckles, but he was slow on the final blow sometimes, like he hoped the referee would stop it."


    "In 1945 Valdez was matched with the only other Cuban heavyweight everyone avoided, a muscular fighter named Federico Malibran.


    The two men went at each other with gusto. Malibran was a quality fighter, a main event performer who used a bag of tricks on his opponent, stopping the still inexperienced Valdez in the fourth round, chopping him down with combinations. Instead of moping around, Valdez asked for a rematch and stopped Malibran in eight.


    "The fights with Malibran were wars," he told me, years later. "He was strong, young and fast and so was I. The first fight I was nervous and he was a seasoned fighter and I lost. I wore him down in the second fight, pounding him and he took a good shot.Those fights made me feel good. People knew who I was and I became aware that I could go far in boxing, trade with the best."


    Five more years went by and not much happened. Valdez fought a few fights in Cuba and some in the United States. He fought only nine times in those five years, losing only to Archie McBride, a likeable, talented fighter managed by best selling author Budd Schulberg.


    One of the big thrills of Nino's life was having boxed three exhibitions with Joe Louis in 1949 and 1950. Valdez always spoke about the Brown Bomber with reverence.


    "It was solemn," he said,"like being with royalty."

    In his comeback, What fighter did Foreman knockout like Valdes?

    At no point was Clarance Henry seen as a better contender than Joe Louis was as an ex champion.
    Losing to Louis Bivins was only 30 years old. Until he retired Bivins would only lose to Tommy Harrison, Ezzard Charles and Bob Baker after Louis. In fact he continued to beat good guys on the circuit even outpointing 22-2 Mike Dejohn in his very last fight four years after Jimmy fought Louis. Dejohn could not deck Bivins anymore than Louis couldn't. In those remaining four years Bivins knocked out Coley Wallace who beat Marciano. He had other wins over guys like Wes Bascome and Charley Doc Wilson. He was no slouch after Louis. Bivins was never a bad fighter. Compare this to the guys comeback Foreman was beating like Crawford Grimsby.. Jimmy Ellis..Everett Bigg foot Martin...

    Who was comeback Foremans Jimmy Bivins?

    In 1948 Savold had three wins and one disqualification loss. He never fought in 1949 but had one win in 1950. So I don't understand this business of having one win in three years? I count four.

    George Foreman lost to Tommy Morrison. And he was only the only contender George met since losing to Holyfeild.

    In his next fight Morrison was shown up by Michael Bentt in a one round blow out.
     
  9. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    What's better, two wins over Cesar Brion or a loss to Tommy Morrison?
     
  10. Eddie Ezzard

    Eddie Ezzard Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,492
    5,250
    Jan 19, 2016
    I initially voted Joe but am having second thoughts. I think it will boil down to a rock 'em, sock 'em toe to toe and even a prime Holyfield didn't fancy his chances against George in that type of contest. And Evander seemed to be a bit more durable than Joe.

    If Joe was indeed a one arm fighter by 51, then that bodes badly, particularly if his footwork had slipped. Keeping a big hulking man like Foreman off with one arm is a tall order if you're not moving.

    It probably boils down to strength and George's strength in 93 was more proven than Joe's at the stage he was at in 51. Morrison was a bomber who would chance his arm against big heavies like Mercer, Lewis and Ruddock but George turned him into a runner.

    George was fighting bigger fighters then Joe was. While it's true to say that Cooper was a former cruiserweight, he was probably bigger than most of Louis' opponents. The point is, George was fighting men the same size as Joe and, at that stage of Louis' career, men that weren't hugely technically inferior to Joe. But Joe was no longer going in with men the size of Foreman.

    It's hard to pick George as that makes Joe (albeit the 1951 version) inferior to Alex Stewart (with all due respect). But Alex had two good arms and two good legs. After all that, I don't know. But scratch my vote for Joe off the score. I'm on the fence.
     
    highlander and Brixton Bomber like this.
  11. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    joe won a shoot out with Max Baer and his fight with a very lively young Cesar Brion was quite physical. I think he can deal with a 43 year old Foreman. The only guys that counted that George fought in his comeback was Holyfeild, Morrison, Moorer. Apart from one punch he lost those fights. They stood with him. Alex Stewart was not as good as Cesar Brion. Alex beat George and so did Axel Schulz and Lou Saverese. These guys were only fringe at best at the time. Yet in my view George did not win them.

    There is no evidence Joe was a one arm fighter in 1951. He decked Agramante in 1951 with that hand. Marciano was able to neutralise the Louis right hand by rushing him, smothering him. Tommy Farr was able to take away the right hand to some extent against a prime Joe Louis. It was I will accept harder for joe to get off With the right hand than in his prime..but he was still using it and effective with it in 1951. You won't find a 1951 film of Joe NOT using his right hand put it that way.

    the only guys that count were no bigger. Morrison, Moorer and Holyfeild.

    Morrison lost two of the three fights you mention here and was snuffed out by Michael Bentt.

    The ones that beat George officially were not hugely technically inferior to Louis I agree. But when did Bald, comeback George beat anyone convincingly who was almost good enough to not be hugely technically inferior to 51 Joe Louis.

    This is a good point. Stewart couldn't do anything better than the 51 version of Joe Louis and he jabbed George silly and was robbed of the decision. joe did have two hands. Against a slow target like George he would get his right hand off much more than he did against Rocky. But Stewart actually shows one hand was enough. But Against George Alex only had a jab himself.
     
  12. SolomonDeedes

    SolomonDeedes Active Member Full Member

    1,419
    2,228
    Nov 15, 2011
    Shkor's upset cuts win over Mauriello was back in 1947, more than two and a half years before his exhibition with Louis, and he had lost the majority of his bouts since then. Flynn's brief spell in the top 10 was also over by the time he met Louis, and in fact he never won again.

    Savold's last victory but one was in May 1948 - more than 3 years before his fight with Louis.
     
  13. Eddie Ezzard

    Eddie Ezzard Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,492
    5,250
    Jan 19, 2016
    You can't count the Baer fight in this. It was 16 years prior. If you use that fight in Joe's favour then you have to use the Frazier fight in George's.

    And I appreciate that Morrison lost two of the three fights you mentioned but my point was that he chose to run against George but not Lewis or Ruddock. That says something about George's strength.

    As I say, I don't know. But 91 George, two years before the timeline of this thread, was competitive, albeit well beaten, against a prime Holyfield who used his feet far more than a '51 Louis would have. You could make a case that prime Joe was not massively superior to Evander and did not have the stylistic advantage of Holyfield's lateral movement that served Evander so well against George. So it depends on how far you think Joe had fallen by 51. Based on how Foreman fared against the mobile Holyfield, for Joe's sake, it had better not have been all that much.
     
    moneytheman12 likes this.
  14. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    A loss to Tommy Morrison if he gets to have a protien shake in the locker room after.
     
    choklab likes this.
  15. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    His last but one? So you mean Savold did win in 1950. it's not what you said is it?

    Savold was scheduled to meet Woodcock in White Cuty open air stadium in September 1949 for the European version of the Wold title, but weeks beforehand Woodcock fell asleep at the wheel of a Lorry driving equipment to his training camp in Wales nearly killing himself in the process when he drove off the road, down a bank, and into some trees. The fight was rescheduled 9 months later when the weather was better. That's the only reason Savold was out of the ring in 1949.

    As previously stated Savold won three fights in 1948. In his forth fight that year (a disqualification loss to Woodcock From low blows) Lee had already legitimately decked Woodcock and looked ahead.