But Louis only had to jab Foreman as many times as Alex Stewart did to close up and swell George's face like the pumpkin Stewart made him resemble. 51' Louis was more than capable. Even under the extreme pressure of Rocky Marciano Joe Marked up Rocky with a step off defensive jab. The speed, workrate and intensity of a young Marciano was infinitely superior to that of the plodding albeit blubbery Foreman. This gives Joe more time to sit down on better jabs and room to use his right more frequently too. If Louis controlled a retreating Jimmy Bivins with a jab and was able to ward off a relentless Marciano some of the time with a defensive step off jab then Louis has everything covered. Especially He has more room and time to introduce more right crosses. I certainly don't think He cannot do any worse than Stewart did against George that's for sure
How would Louis have taken the punches Foreman took from Holyfield, Moorer and Morrison? George was able withstand tremendous punishment in those and all those guys could bang. Does Louis stand up?
I'm starting to think these challengers Louis beat in his comeback prior to fighting Marciano would have been world champions in any other era, maybe even dominant ones.
Morrison showed that any fighter with the discipline to just keep circling away from old foreman's right could beat him on points. Old Louis could certainly have done that, but I'm not 100% sure he would have.
As I said - one win in the 3 years leading up to his meeting with Louis in June 1951. That solitary win being in 1950. His last win before that was in May 1948 - more than 3 years earlier.
I think Holyfeild would have beaten 51’ Louis in the way Ezzard Charles did. Remember, losing hard to Charles joe still marked up Charles worse than Walcott ever managed. He still had heavy hands. Ezzard said he only knew he had the fight won when the bell sounded the end of the fight. Moorer did not beat a genuine Holyfeild. And the rematch proved it. There is no evidence that Moorer or Morrison could have beat Joe Louis. I think those two would have struggled more with Bivins and Cesar brion more than Joe did if I am honest. I regard Louis at that point as the kind of level of a Ray Mercer. And Mercer was too much for those too. Morrison’s power did not effect Micheal Bentt or Ray Mercer, I can’t see it being a deciding factor with Louis. Morrison and Moorer have to be as good as Charles to beat Louis and they just weren’t.
That’s a silly way of looking at it. This is what is called massaging statistics. Savold fought woodcock in December 1948. His fourth fight that year. He decked woodcock then was disqualified for a low blow when Woodcock got up. A rematch was scheduled, for a version of the World title, on a big outdoor show for September 1949 but as I explained it fell through so they wound up fighting 9 months later instead. It drew requests for £150,000 in ticket sales ($600,000) but there was a limit of 60,000 seats at the stadium. Savold was under contract, That’s why Savold did not fight in 1949. Savolds fight with Woodcock was actually bigger and higher profile than Foreman losing to Morrison. He was coming off a loss to get his title fight. In fact when Foreman challenged Moorer for a world title his “last but one win” was April 1992. George did not fight Moorer until November 1994. So George had one win in two years and seven months. This is George himself not Joe Louis’ opponent. If you want to play that game first we must select Foremans best win on his comeback and look at that guys record. Shall we say Gerry Cooney? Gerry Cooney last but one win was in 1984 against George Chaplin so that means when he fought Foreman, Cooney had one win in 6 years! So in 1994 Foreman had one win to his name in two and a half years. On his comeback George Foremans best win was over a guy with one win in six years. This is the guy who beats #1contender Joe Louis?
Um - no, it's called a fact. When he fought Louis, Savold had one win in the last three years. Try to explain it away if you like, but don't pretend it's not true.
Well it makes Savold twice as good as Cooney dosnt it? Since Cooney had one win in six years when he fought Foreman. Since you have decided activity is a relevant issue what do you make of Foreman having just one win in in two and a half years when he challenged Moorer?
Well he didn't land much of anything on Bentt and Mercer had one of the toughest necks of all time in the heavyweight division. Both of those guys would find `51 Joe Louis`s chin. Not saying they necessarily beat him he may land on them first.
Mercer, at his best, was a nightmare for a puncher and a dream for a boxer. What kind of a man does better against Lennox Lewis than he does against Jesse Ferguson? I think any version of Joe Louis is in for a difficult night against Mercer unless he decided to box him
Well, firstly that's wrong - Cooney had three wins in the last six years when he fought Foreman. More to the point, it's irrelevant since I haven't suggested Cooney was a particularly dangerous opponent, nor indeed mentioned Foreman's career at all. I assume the fact that you're trying to change the subject means you admit you made a mistake when you claimed my original post was inaccurate.
I really think Moorer and Morrison would go life and death with Bivins and Cesar Brion. There is no guarantee they get past either in my view. And that puts both of them beyond any threat to Joe Louis in 51. This is Bivins After he fought Joe Louis. This content is protected Moorer was a weak champion. He wound up beating Holyfield on the strangest of performances. Evander had a funny turn, most likely a reaction to something he took, having decked Moorer he seemed to turn into somebody else. The rematch was different wasn’t it. He had Moorer up and down like a yoyo. Imagine Moorer against Cesar Brion? This content is protected
Where are you getting that from? Cooney beat Eddie Gregg in 1986. His last win before meeting Foreman. The win Cooney had before that was 1984 against Chaplin. Cooney fights Foreman in 1990. That’s one win between Chaplin and fighting Foreman in 1990. Six years.