1955 Archie Moore vs Chris Byrd

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SuzieQ49, May 24, 2016.


  1. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,730
    Sep 14, 2005
  2. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,574
    Jan 30, 2014
    Would be a very interesting cat-and-mouse matchup with Moore stalking him and winging power punches at him while Byrd moves away, jabs, and holds.
     
  3. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,491
    80,705
    Aug 21, 2012
    I think it would be a classic. Two very smart boxers going at it.
     
  4. foreman&dempsey

    foreman&dempsey Boxing Addict banned

    4,805
    148
    Dec 7, 2015
    lol 1955 moore? byrd easily
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,722
    29,070
    Jun 2, 2006
    If this is post Marciano Moore , I'll take Byrd by close but clear dec.
     
  6. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,422
    9,391
    Jul 15, 2008
    Look Moore was a great fighter , no question but he was a level below the best of the best .. his losses to Charles and Burley proved this .. I also feel he was over rated by some as a heavyweight as the names he beat were nothing terrific for the most part .. his vulnerability was speed and Byrd was very fast and tricky .. this would be an interesting fight .. I lean to Archie as few were trickier but imagine it competitive ..
     
  7. jowcol

    jowcol Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,333
    838
    Jul 22, 2004
    Greetings f&d!
    I agree with your "lol".
    How about a 1955 Byrd vs. a 1955 Moore?
    How about a 21st century Moore vs. a 1955 Byrd?
    LOL :lol:
     
  8. jowcol

    jowcol Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,333
    838
    Jul 22, 2004
    I fail to see how losses to Ezz and Burley put him a level below one of the best given his entire career? :huh
     
  9. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,455
    Jan 6, 2007
    Some fans today seem to forget that in Archie's era, that the best were fighting the best "multiple times".....so rivialries developed....and someone had to lose ever so often.

    As opposed to "Canelo-weight" today, brought to you for some unexplained reason, by Golden Boy.
     
  10. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,026
    25,086
    Jan 3, 2007
    Byrd by decision. Chris was hard to hit flush and didn't fold easy when he did. Good mover for a man of 6'1", 215 lbs, which incidentally was bigger than the average man Moore usually fought. And by 1955 Archie was already getting close to 40.
     
  11. Dubal Speek

    Dubal Speek Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,545
    2
    Apr 27, 2016
    I guess the people picking Byrd dwell in an alterate reality where Byrd vs Oquendo and Moore's series with Maxim and Johnson didn't happen? Maybe, we will see.
     
  12. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,026
    25,086
    Jan 3, 2007
    Not likely :lol:
     
  13. ribtickler68

    ribtickler68 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,985
    131
    Apr 27, 2013
    I'm as guilty as the next man for pitting these cross era fighters against each other, but I am coming round to your way of thinking: there are way too many variables to make a valid prediction.
     
  14. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    Look Byrd was a good fighter , no question but he was a level below the best of the best .. his losses to Wlad and Ike proved this .. I also feel he was over rated by some as a heavyweight as the names he beat were nothing terrific for the most part
     
  15. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,422
    9,391
    Jul 15, 2008
    Guess you have a lot of free time .. :D