1962 S.I article. Ingemar Johansson on Sonny Liston

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by choklab, Oct 11, 2016.


  1. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,645
    Dec 31, 2009
  2. SolomonDeedes

    SolomonDeedes Active Member Full Member

    1,412
    2,212
    Nov 15, 2011
    The credibility of Johansson's analysis is slightly undermined by his conclusion that Liston has no power in his left hook and is too slow to beat Patterson.
     
  3. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,645
    Dec 31, 2009
    The Liston fights that Ingo was watching did not include the famous left hooking Liston was famous for. He noted the long strong Jab. That Sonny compensated for his speed by being first all the time.

    It was intresting to read that Ingo felt Patterson had more chance if he used his speed and started with jabs. He recognised Floyd would only expose himself using hooks or standing off waiting. Which is kind of what he did.

    He said Sonny can be hit with jabs, that what makes him look so good is he is always coming in, but if you do it to him he is the one who will look tired.

    It's one thing noticing what will work and another being able to do it all, but two years later Ali achieved what Ingo was talking about. It was a combination of speed, jabbing and Sonny getting tired that beat him as much as the shoulder injury.
     
  4. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,553
    43,831
    Apr 27, 2005

    Slightly undermined? lol
     
    mcvey likes this.
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,610
    28,866
    Jun 2, 2006
  6. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,645
    Dec 31, 2009
    I agree Listons left hook was a great punch when it took out poor Bethea, but Ingo was watching the Besmanoff, Machen and Westphal fights. I assume those comments were made during critical moments when Sonny was less effective, which is possibly the best time to remark on the effectiveness of the over all use of a punch. Obviously Liston had a great left hook. That goes without saying.

    Machen was able to keep turning Liston which effected Sonny's usual balanced poise. Maybe it was at those points those comments were made?

    Liston certainly landed a great straight right on poor Wesphal!
     
  7. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,645
    Dec 31, 2009
    Part of the business of looking invincible is that folks will want to study and research ways to beat a new champion. I remember when Tyson looked so dominant articles about how to beat him began to pop up.

    Here is Some more evidence here that people were starting to Look for ways to beat Sonny Liston by 1964.

    http://www.si.com/vault/1964/02/10/608210/the-four-who-baffled-liston
     
  8. surfinghb

    surfinghb Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,523
    17,801
    Aug 26, 2017
    The Liston bashing threads are getting a little old here
     
    Ronnie Raygun and swagdelfadeel like this.
  9. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,610
    28,866
    Jun 2, 2006
    I've exposed this cr*p on the other thread.
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  10. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,598
    18,339
    Jun 25, 2014
    I've read some boxing magazines that published just before the first Patterson-Liston fight, and a number of "experts" cited the Liston-Machen fight as the reason they were picking Patterson to win.

    I can also see how Johansson, who knocked out Machen in about two minutes, could watch Liston and Machen go at it for close to an hour and Ingemar walk believing he (Ingo) hit harder than Liston.

    That's why it's always more interesting to keep track of what people were saying before fights happened. Because once the fights occur, perceptions often change wildly. After Liston destroyed Patterson twice, and you read how D'Amato didn't want Floyd to fight Sonny, and how the NAACP didn't want Floyd to fight Sonny ... the story changes and perceptions are forever altered that Liston was always perceived as invincible, when he wasn't.

    Who knows, maybe a Liston-Johansson fight would've been similar to Foreman-Lyle.
     
    Russell and choklab like this.
  11. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,645
    Dec 31, 2009
    That is exactly right. This is all perfectly understandable taken in context of the times. As you say not everyone could forecast the future.

    Too many people can't get past any popular opinion decided upon with the advantage of hindsight. Mcvey has long been a stubborn undisputed champion of this school of thought.

    There is too much phoney outrage when anybody puts forth a view based on a moment in time (without the advantage of hindsight) that may conflict with a modern take on a vintage era.
     
  12. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,610
    28,866
    Jun 2, 2006
    Don't you use my name.I've more knowledge of Liston than you will ever have!
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  13. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,645
    Dec 31, 2009
    More phoney outrage...

    You are entitled to your opinion but there's little more to unearth other than the unsubstantiated mysteries. Then there's always that fool who wrote a book about Sonny via a sèance. He was in contact with the friendly ghost of Sonny Liston. Perhaps you can match that guy?

    https://www.createspace.com/6146009
     
    Last edited: Oct 14, 2017
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  14. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    15,884
    11,432
    Sep 21, 2017
    I wish Johannson fought Liston
     
    choklab likes this.
  15. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,645
    Dec 31, 2009
    It really would have told us who was the greatest of that era. Between Liston, Ingo and Floyd. ironically even though he was knocked out by both of ingo and Sonny it was Patterson, not the other two, who could string a few defences together beating the most #1 contenders of the three.

    A win over Ingo would have put Sonny firmly ahead of the pack. I favour Sonny but Ingo would have a realistic chance of winning one of a three fight series. Ingo has all the ingredients to be a bogey man -if he lands first. Ingo moves better than the George Gainford trained Bert Whitehurst who lasted 20 rounds against Sonny and ingos right hand was better than either Ali or Leotis Martin.

    Sonny has that crushing power, the danger of being able to land from a further distance than most were used to -but nobody struggled to land blows on him. Whitehurst, a sparring partner of Ingo, did swat him quite a bit.

    And I don't think Sonny fought enough power punchers either. Cleveland Williams did bang but was unable to connect as solidly on good fighters as he did on lesser men so his fleeting moments on the way to early crushing knockouts with Sonny were as significant as his moments against Ali and Bob Satterfeild who both flattened the big Cat too.

    In many ways an Ingo v Liston fight could be like Foreman v Lyle. A real smash up.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.