1967 Muhammad Ali Vs. Zaire Muhammad Ali

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by ikrasevic, Sep 26, 2023.


Who wins?

This poll will close on Jun 26, 2088 at 2:40 PM.
  1. Peak Ali of the first career

  2. Peak Ali of the second career

Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,183
    8,687
    Jul 17, 2009
    The two Alis must be kept apart. Otherwise they will be subject to the Blinovitch Limitation effect.
     
    Pugguy likes this.
  2. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,924
    44,764
    Apr 27, 2005
  3. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,183
    8,687
    Jul 17, 2009
    In 1967 Muhammad was at his very best - as we all know. A more evenly balanced thread would be Zaire Ali v the 1964 Cassius Clay who fought Sonny Liston the first time. Cassius was just as fast as his 1967 self but not quite as polished.
     
    ikrasevic likes this.
  4. Pugguy

    Pugguy Ingo, The Thinking Man’s GOAT Full Member

    17,415
    28,338
    Aug 22, 2021
    :lol: Ha! I had to look that up - I’m not too familiar with Dr Who. Nice one. :D
     
    Stevie G likes this.
  5. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,183
    8,687
    Jul 17, 2009
    Thanks,Pugguy.
     
    Pugguy likes this.
  6. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,183
    8,687
    Jul 17, 2009
    Quite an even one. One Ali on his way to his prime and the other just off it over the other side of the mountain.
     
    Pugguy likes this.
  7. META5

    META5 Active Member Full Member

    1,491
    2,325
    Jun 28, 2005
    1974 split decision.

    1964 Ali would start off like he did against Liston with excessive footmovement and headmovement. 74's right hand lead and relative lack of footspeed would allow him to plant and land counters, despite me thinking that 64's jab would be too quick for 74 to spend too much time trying to read. 1974 was rougher in the clinch and smarter in how he manipulated the head.

    1964 would look flashier and have the more eye-catching combinations but I think the smarts, toughness and experience of 1974 might just do the trick.

    I also wouldn't be surprised if 64 jabs 74's head off too.
     
    Stevie G likes this.
  8. Dynamicpuncher

    Dynamicpuncher Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,566
    32,388
    Jan 14, 2022
    I think it's pretty simple a prime Ali in mid to late 60s was winning fights based on amazing athletic ability, speed, movement. Ali in 74 was having to rely on his durability and boxing IQ. And whilst both of those attributes are good obviously, i think the fact that Ali was slowing down and was having to ship way more punishment. Shows that Ali in the mid to late 60s was the far better fighter.
     
  9. ThatOne

    ThatOne Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,371
    8,737
    Jan 13, 2022
    Any iteration of Ali up to and including Manila Ali whups Foreman and Liston. They would just go about it differently.
     
    cuchulain, Stevie G and ikrasevic like this.
  10. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,183
    8,687
    Jul 17, 2009
    I concur.
     
  11. Richard M Murrieta

    Richard M Murrieta Now Deceased 2/4/25 Full Member

    22,635
    30,410
    Jul 16, 2019
    Muhammad Ali once said in his later years, the only one who could beat Muhammad Ali was Cassius Clay (Muhammad Ali)
     
    Stevie G, ikrasevic and Pugguy like this.
  12. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,463
    11,502
    Jan 6, 2007

    Everything here is correct Richard.

    Except the bit about 74 Ali not having stamina.

    A year later, in 75, he demonstrated top level stamina against Joe Frazier in Manila.


    But yes, 67 Ali wins by a near shutout...just too fast.