You have to reach back to 1980 or '81 to find the peak Hagler. And that version of Marvin -- or even the 1985 one, for that matter -- takes the fight to Leonard and beats him by clear decision. I agree SRL will run and lose a lopsided decision before he allows himself to get KOd.
Im pretty sure it was Hagler who couldnt land a damn thing when leonard was on the ropes and went on to cry about it for 20 years
Well, the punchstats show SRL only landed a handfull more punches throughout the fight so Marv must have landed something against those ropes. Leonard was so tenacious that it's hard to see him getting stopped in a fight in with Hagler even in '83. Can see him getting knocked down though and losing an exciting fight on points.
A great natural middleweight in/near his prime should beat a great natural welterweight in/near his prime. I pick Hagler.
Hagler had been on the decline since about 1983-84 or so, but look at Leonard. He hadn't fought in 3 years, just once in 5 years, and most of his career was at welter and jr. middle.
Leonard's stamina wasn't the same. He got tired after a few rounds against Hagler, then had to get his 2nd wind back. Sure he used his legs a lot, but Leonard's stamina in the late 70s and early 80s was pretty amazing. He even finished the 15th strong in Montreal after taking a murdering to the body from Duran. Leonard was still very fast though, and it was pretty amazing how sharp he was after that sort of layoff.