1985 Tyson vs 1978 larry Holmes

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by heerko koois, Jun 6, 2014.


  1. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,115
    25,280
    Jan 3, 2007
    This reads like an intentionally misleading and deceptive post.. Holmes was 36 years old for the Spinks fights and arguably got robbed in at least one of them. He was 47 against Neilson and quite possibly robbed in that one too. Tyson was in the peak of his prime against Spinks in 1988 and while he was diminished for the Neilson bout, was still many years younger than Holmes. And Holmes actual fight with Tyson should be disregarded for obvious reasons as well.. If we're going by that logic then you might as well point out that Holmes beat Ali's conquerors in Norton, Leon, and Berbick as well as beating Ali himself, there bye making him the superior fighter. I'm also not sure that Mike's resume is better than Holmes either, though there are certain highlights that could give him an argument.
     
  2. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    i understand what you say, my ost was in response to the idiot who said compared to Holmes, Tysons resume was full of cans
     
  3. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,115
    25,280
    Jan 3, 2007
    Yeah that's not real accurate. Tyson and Holmes fought comparable opposition and in some cases even the same guys. You can argue that they both fought decent opponents whom the other didn't like Holmes fighting witherspoon and Tyson fighting Ruddock, but anyone who thinks that their opposition was in two different categories is wrong.
     
  4. heerko koois

    heerko koois Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,135
    17,711
    Apr 26, 2006
    :good
     
  5. ForemanJab

    ForemanJab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,993
    12,318
    May 8, 2014
    Holmes would win by wide UD or late stoppage. Tyson was just an 18 year old kid while Holmes was a grown ass man at the top of his game.
     
  6. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,047
    Oct 25, 2006
    Tyson in his first year as a pro versus a near-prime Holmes? Hard to pick Tyson here. Peak for peak though, I've always felt Tyson overcomes him.
     
  7. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,223
    23,871
    Jul 21, 2012
    And Tyson would of ran through Norton early.
     
  8. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,638
    17,706
    Apr 3, 2012
    Time frame isn't fair, but I still would pick Tyson if forced to pick someone.
     
  9. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,667
    2,153
    Aug 26, 2004
    any version of Tyson was a more complete fighter than Shavers and Snipes and Tyson hit as hard as Shavers and Snipes, had faster hands and was a better finisher than both men by far....any version of Tyson was a dangerous foe for prime Holmes....
     
  10. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,685
    2,562
    Oct 18, 2004
    Larry Holmes would kayo Mike in six rounds, too much experience for him.
     
  11. heerko koois

    heerko koois Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,135
    17,711
    Apr 26, 2006
    :huh
    You reallly believe this ?
     
  12. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,685
    2,562
    Oct 18, 2004
    Considering the time frames involved, yep:good!