Tucker beats Spinks. Not only was he naturally much bigger. But also very skilled. There a reason why Spinks avoided most of the better heavyweights of the era, to cash in his chips against Mike Tyson , then retire. Spinks wasn't a very good heavyweight. He caught lightning in bottle with his victories over Holmes. He was wise enough to fight a couple of relatively safe opponents like a depressed and drug/ alcoholic version of Cooney, and something named Tangstad. Most of the better heavyweights of that era would've had a very good chance of beating Spinks, especially with his worsening knee issues. Spinks himself probably knew that. So why not make the most money of his career by fighting Tyson and retire.
Tyson did exactly what he usually did and especially in that situation, blasted through on of the slowest starting power punchers in boxing. Not Tucker's thing. The Jinx gets out of the starting gate, then shows Tony things like coming from weird angles that Holmes had never seen before or since, even as experienced as Larry was. Michael was able to compete on even terms with the Assassin twice over the Championship Distance. He takes a clear decision here, finishing the job Buster Douglas started before he abruptly crumbled in the tenth round. By Tyson, the Jinx was used to taller opponents like Vonzell Johnson, Holmes 2X and Cooney. Unlike with Tyson, he brings all that experience to bear with Tucker, and it's just too much for Tony to compete with.
Tucker was a Ring-rated heavyweight, in his prime, and wanting a Title - Just the type of heavyweight Spinks and Lewis wanted to avoid when there was better money to be made from a Lineal Championship bout with Tyson. There was little appetite to tempt a derailing of that ambition and a derailing it would have been, with Tucker stopping Spinks late.
I think it would’ve been close and Spinks would not necessarily have looked all that good, but I think he would’ve found a way to eek it on points. I think he was a bit faster and busier, threw more combos, and his awkward footwork and head moment combined with fast flurries would have thrown off Tucker sufficiently to get a close decision. Tucker could be outworked. But I wouldn’t be totally shocked to see Tucker pull off the upset either. Which is why they avoided him, because why fight a guy that good for so little money and risk the big payday?
You know what makes me so excited about Tucker? He fought Tyson in 1987, and Lewis and stayed on his feet. And who didn't stay on their feet? After the fight with Tucker, Lewis destroyed Ruddock in the next fight. After the fight with Tucker in the following year, Tyson destroyed Spinks and Holmes. I think that Tucker could have done more with better management and a healthier life. A TRUE representative of the lost generation of the 80s.
And now I guess - Tucker has Douglas and McCall in his resume; those who took off the "zero" from Tyson and Lewis. 4 man tournament... https://www.boxingforum24.com/threads/4-man-tournament.710947/ ... should have been: Lewis Vs. Tucker and Bowe Vs. Holyfield The outcome would be the same, but it would be more interesting. I'm not sure what Steward (or anyone else) said about Ruddock: "you shouldn't judge a boxer by two losses (to Tyson)".