1988 Sparring Footage of Thomas Hearns vs Matthew Saad Muhammad

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Hi-Tech, Mar 3, 2026.


  1. greynotsoold

    greynotsoold Boxing Addict

    5,863
    7,881
    Aug 17, 2011
    Do you think that would have made them better fighters?
     
  2. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,185
    27,658
    Jan 3, 2007
    Hearns was the better fighter but I just don’t think he could take too many of those hard shots to the chin from Saad. The man could punch when they were prime and in a real fight.
     
    Hi-Tech likes this.
  3. Hi-Tech

    Hi-Tech Active Member Full Member

    1,227
    1,712
    Nov 4, 2022
    I agree, although I would give Tommy a chance as he's proven he can hang with tough, rugged fighters in the higher weights like Dennis Andries and Nate Miller. And Saad has shown he can be hurt and dropped with the right hand, such as in the Richie Kates fight. But I don't know, I still see Saad digging deep and catching Tommy in the later rounds for the stoppage victory.

    What's also interesting in this matchup though imo, was that both fighters were more the boxer types at the start of their careers and only later on did they become the devastating punchers they're known today. Tommy may have been the more talented of the two but Saad was just straight-up stronger and tougher.
     
    Last edited: Mar 22, 2026
    mr. magoo likes this.
  4. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,185
    27,658
    Jan 3, 2007
    Exactly. While Hearns shouldn’t be written off completely, this fight has the makings of an Iran Barkley result for Hearns.
     
    Hi-Tech likes this.