1988 Tyson vs 1990 Holyfield

Well, Tyson is known for that.

 

you sure hes not your alt? You have alot in common

 

I just like exposing revisionist lying garbage like you.

Never have I known someone idolise a filthy, convicted, *** beast the way you do. Perhaps that is why you come out with that crap about him raping peoples mothers, because you admire, and empathise with it.

Have you applied to Winson Green prison yet for permission to write fanboy letters to some of their rapists?

Edit. Oh and to answer your question. My mother had quite a decent amount of money of her own, and consequently had no use for an ugly rich *****, with a high pitched girlie lisp.

 

Yeah, a bit suspicious about Unforgiven. He, or maybe she, comes across like he, or is it she(?), has earned some sort of graduate degree in psychology. Whether it's a master's, Ph.d or Psy.d...I would really like to know. Or could (s)he be psychologist to one Evan Fields???

I know we're here for incredible debates but this overanalyzing tripe is for the birds. Keep it simple, stupid.

 

i know for a fact MarkClitheroe and Foxy01 are the same person.

Same BS, same agenda, both always constantly mentioning 'Tyson nuthuggers' in nearly every post.

Its definitely the same twit.

 

Holyfield would be too brave for his own good & take a pretty severe beating.

Nov '91, Tyson by TKO 10 in a brutal slugfest.

Comparing these earlier versions with the 1996 versions is night & day, they were both totally different.

& Holyfield DID NOT have a heart problem. The non compliant left ventricle was a mis diagnosis.

 

It was an attempt at humour. Tyson said "F**k you in the ass 'til you love me ******".
I'll remember to try harder.

And no, I have no alt ..... not lately, not on this thread.

WTF are you going on about ?

 

Holyfield fought like a complete degenerate against Tyson.

 

How is your obsession with convicted rapists progressing? Written any fan letters to new ones lately?

You really should try removing your head from Tysons rectum, and looking at the world as it is. Holyfield would have destroyed Tyson in 90 / 91 for the same reason he destroyed him in 96. He intimidated the cretin. Plain and simple. Holyfield had the heart of a lion, and the brain of a warrior. Tyson had the mental fortitude of a gnat. Holyfield would have always won the boxing match, the fight, or the the fouling contest.

Get over it.

 

Ha, I'm not sure. Just trying to flush out the heathens. You're a respectable poster.

 

:good Good.
I haven't yet faded into Bolivian.

 

:good Well if you didn't die, it doesn't count. And don't try to wipe the blood from my cheek!

 

I agree, had they fought in 91' it would have been a very similar result to what we witnessed in 96'. Holyfield would have weathered a torrid opener to slowly counter Tyson & stop him late on, if anything Holyfield was better in 91' & was less shop worn, he was yet to fight Riddick Bowe & had much more in the tank as opposed to 96' when he was in decline.
Holyfield TKO 11 Tyson.

 

This. Holyfield in my opinion was always a bad style matchup for Tyson. Tyson even in his prime never had the inside game to keep Holyfield from beating him up on the inside, since a prime Holyfield would be on Tyson like a second skin. I see Tyson from 1988 quitting in the later rounds.

 

Tyson by ko . Holyfield would always have been a tough fight for him . Same as he would be for anyone in history. But evander would have got too brave for his own good. iron mike inside 6 .