1988 Tyson vs 2010 Wlad Klitschko

Douglas of Toyko or even the Berbick fight would of decimated Wlad.

Buster had all the tools of a great heavyweight apart from self discipline.

Wlad needed to excessively hold slow ass Thompson in fight one because his latteral movement kept throwing off Wlads straight punches.
Buster bounces around Wlad poping his jab to his head and body and Wlad doesn't know what to do. If he goes for a clinch , he eats an uppercut right up the centre.

Wlad never fought these caliber of guys who were big and skilled in his career and when he did he was destroyd in 2 rounds by Sanders and got floored and quit out against Williamson. Both nowhere near the level of Douglas, Tucker, Thomas, Bruno etc.

Wlad lost to ordinary level guy but never beat anybody better than them to prove he was any better. Wlad has no case beating authentic ATGs

 

Yes and yes. Puritty was a journeyman, not Douglas.

 

Yeah and he got up to win, the bum Tyson got dropped by Douglas, Holyfield, Lewis and Williams and got up to win, wait for it..... None!!

Prime Wladamir would use Tyson has a punchbag, Tyson is poor on the inside so Wlad would control him easy. He'd soften him up and take him out in the mid to late rounds.

 

intersting. you like to pounce on Douglas beating a version of Tyson clearly not at his best

then you ignore that Klitschko was knocked down 3 times by a bum like Peter, and destroyed by 3 D class bums in Brewster, Sanders, Purrity.

Tyson lost to 1 journeyman in a fight that he almost won by KO.
Wlad lost by KO to three bums even worse than Douglas.

Wlad is more successful? On what basis? because he has title defenses? Calzaghe (21) and Darius (23) have a lot of defenses too. according to you they are better than Klitschko and 99% of boxers in history

Wlad fights bums. Tyson beat men.

88 Tyson crushes any version of Wlad/Vitali easily

 

Wlad fought Purity in 1998, that's 12 years before 2010. Tyson fought Douglas in 1990, that's a whopping 2 years after 1988. We're taking in to account the dates the OP stated.

 

Interesting, Tyson wasn't at his best because he got his ass kicked by Douglas. You're as good as you are on the night and Tyson was demolished!

He's better because he's got more defences and a better record, Wlad is 39 next. Tyson at 39 was getting beat by the lard arse Kevin Mcbride.

2010 Wlad dismantles any version of Tyson easily.

Tyson fought has beens and never beens.

 

Wlad couldn't beat Peter easily, haha.

 

Tyson couldn't beat Tillis easily, haha

 

Tillis troubled Tyson with movement andhad grit. Peter troubled Wlad with coming forward in
a straight line. For someone with in your ipinion the strongest right hand ever, Wlad
couldn't even floor Peter. Furthermore
Youve got to be the most annoying diluted poster since foxy or glover, you're
Probably the same person. You won't even admit that youre foreman jab.

 

So why bring up Douglas? Derp

 

Wlad has no bounce or pep in his step. With that lead hand hung low, explain
to me how he avoids a counter hook. Since you brought up Tillis, theres a point in that
fight when Tyson is almost ducking to the floor to avoid punches. Mike had some of the
best defense ever, and he could be predicted and timed as Ali said. Wlad sure as hell
isn't gonna have ice in his veins to do so.

 

hes the same troll Foremansjab, foremanshook, Dan4579, Markclitheroe, Winger etc

Same guy multiple alts

 

Hes a complete hypocrite

he claims Tyson 'struggled' against Biggs and that Biggs was shot due to his life outside the ring, even though he was 15-0, but for some reason...he doesnt afford the same excuse to Tyson for losing to Douglas

He claims 'Tyson was no Tua'

and despite multiple requests, hes unable to provide me with Tuas top ten wins.........

 

Peter is a hell of a lot bigger than Tyson so he didn't need to fight like him!!!

Wlad wouldn't need to trouble Tyson with movement as his fundamentals are more than adequate to control Tyson.

For someone who's such a devastating finisher Tyson couldn't even floor Bonecrusher Smith or Tony Tucker, we can all play those games.

You've got to be on of the most deluded Tyson nuthuggers on this forum who lives in Tyson land! You won't even admit you're Azzer85!

 

Come on dumbass show me where I said wino and crackhead Biggs struggled against Tinkerbell Tyson??

And another lie, I said that if Tyson had some of Tua's quality she would have been more successful, such as Tua's stamina and late knockout power, Tinkerbells power diminished massively late on in fights. And also if he had a chin like Tua's he sure wouldn't have been left crawling on the floor like a baby by Douglas or beaten from pillar to post by Holyfield who wasn't even a big puncher for a heavyweight!

Give over now will you, I'm destroying you here. :rofl