1990 Holyfield vs 1987 tyson

We'll leave it there then since that point of disagreement can't be resolved.

my main points are:

Lennox was a to 3 or 4 ATG

and

1987 Tyson would , IMO, destroy any version of Holyfield.

 

YOUR A HYPACRITACLE CLOWN AND DONT LIKE BEING CALLED ON IT ! And its bull**** that LL took him lightly ! In fact the same LL who canceled several fights against VITALLY and also claimed himself he wouldnt want to lose to a white man ! Youve been exposed again as a hypacritacle bullshitter ! Oh and merry X-MAS ! :hi: PS you claimed LL was over the hill against VITALY but in his prime against his previous oponent ! :yep Your an ammusing dip**** and your arguments are pathetic ! ( I also seem to remeber you claiming BOWE fought HOLY instead of LL because of a certain SIZE issue also ) Again MERRY X-MAS ! Or do you call it the HOLIDAYS since your such a patrinizing clown !:deal Oh and Ill leave the spelling mistakes so you can at least have a comeback of sorts !

 

Oh I see but you claim SANDERS was a bum and not a great talent when prepared ( And SANDERS was also super prepared for VLAD ) ? And I quess you DONT thInk VLAD UNDER prepared for him ! Another exposure of your hypacriticle double standard BULL**** ! :hi: Your ammusing and transparent ! :deal Your rose colored glasses have also given you selective memory !:smoke

 

TYSON!!

When he was in his prime. No one could beat him.

 

When Holyfield unified the cruiserweight title against Qawi, his work rate and endurance over 15 rounds was exemplary of the finest ironmen. He seemed to never stop punching and moving. Then, he demonstrated a shocking ability to take a punch in his barnburner with the bigger Mike Dokes, ultimately demonstrating very startling late round heavyweight power in flooring and stopping the hard chinned Dokes during the tenth stanza.

Nobody defeated Evander before he turned 30. Moorer had to climb off the deck to decision an impaired Holyfield, as did Bowe, before Big Daddy registered an eighth round stoppage in their rubber match, the earliest anybody has been able to take out Evander as yet. Of course Tyson never showed he could get up to win (or even go the distance after being dropped).

An early round knockout win for Tyson is out of the question. There was never any indication during Holyfield's peak that this might be a feasible result. Tyson was only able to stop Ribalta, among those opponents who lasted more than seven rounds with him. Evander proved to have superior physical strength to Tyson when they did meet.

1990 Holyfield would either stop 1987 Tyson late, or take a unanimous decision verdict. Ultimately, The Real Deal's willpower, durability, endurance and strength would have been too much for Tyson to overcome.

If Tyson and Holyfield had met as originally scheduled, before Tyson's incarceration, Tyson would have been favored, probably overconfident, and Holyfield would have surprised him and many others, as he eventually did in actuality when they finally squared off in 1996.

 

:good good post !

 

atsch BUSTER DID !

 

How do you look yourself in the ****ing mirror? atsch

 

You kicked everybody's ***** ASS with this post. Though I realize that's not saying much when you're up against typical Mike Tyson fans, who simply romanticize him in their heads, match their hero IQ-point-for-IQ-point, and say embarassing things like:

Oh dear.......

 

Oh right, you'll leave in the spelling mistakes deliberately will you? You never take them out anyway you dumb mother****er :rofl

Of course it's bull**** that Lewis took VITLAY lightly....why? Because you say so that's why!!! Of course what everyone else saw with their lying eyes has absolutely no relevence in this discussion whatsoever.

You appear to have a reading problem as well as a spelling problem - what I actually said was that Lewis was better against Tyson than he was back in 1996 - I believe Lewis's 'prime' actually came in around 1999. Lewis was past his very best against Tyson and over the hill and undertrained against VITLAY, any idiot could see that...therefore it comes as no surprise that you never saw it, you ******** :deal

As for the rest of your babbling rant, I really don't have the first clue what the **** you're talking about.

 

Comparing Corrie Sanders and Buster Douglas........right :rofl :rofl :rofl

Sanders may have been super prepared for WALDO but he also may not have been, seeing as the first time he swung at WALDO the shattering of glass could be heard 500 miles away :deal Sanders didn't need to be a great talent to beat WALDO he just needed to attack and land a haymaker that put WALDO into broken helicopter mode, and that's what he did.

To do what Douglas did, to the most ferocious and feared fighter in the division...well that took skill, guts and heart (he got up off the floor to win, remember which in you Klit lovers eyes means his chin is concrete, right? :nut )

Comparing Sanders V WALDO to Tyson V Douglas is just idiotic, there isn't even a comparison to be made. I'd expect no less from a moron like you.

 

I dont care what you or anyone says, Tyson would make Holyfield his ***** if they fought in 91. The Tyson of 96 was only maybe 60% of his former self, if that. He lost alot of speed and timing by that point, and instead of throwing combinations he was throwing one punch at a time.

 

So now BUSTER is a super talent dispite losing to every desent fighter he ever faced except MIKE ! And of cource LLs prime was whenever your agenda suits it ! Your a ****ing moron and a transparent hypacrit ! And since you know exactly what it takes to beat WALDO why dont you go make yourself a million and train SAM PETER ! Your actually a weirdo man !:yep

 

You dont have a clue what Im talking about ? You really do have selective memory dont you ! Your not even good at your usual spin bud ! you simply come across as a patrinizing bias moron !:hi:

 

Buster beat Mccall to fight Tyson in 1990, the same Mccall who knocked out your favorite fighter with one punch, so Mccall wasnt a decent fighter in your opinion?