1990 Holyfield vs 1987 tyson

:smoke Yes he was decent but so is SANDERS ! Whats your point exactly ? I was addressing the other dipshits hypocrissy ! he twists everything to suit his ******ed agenda and its quite ammusing ! At least your steady with your accessments of all fighters i seen you post about ! :yep

 

It dosen't matter what version of Tyson Holyfield fought, an 84-89-95-or **** IT even a 2002 version or now today! DECEMBER 23 2008 Holy beats that ass:yep HOLY has that Mental toughness that Tyson never had, that's what wins dogfight's, that's why Tyson got himself DQ'D by biting Holy
s ears, because he gave up, and couldn't and didn't have the mental fortitude to try and win...:deal

 

Its cool, I wasnt trying to dog you or that. He beat a good fighter in Mccall in 89 and went on to beat Tyson in 90, Buster stepped up that night and showed everything you would want in a Heavyweight that night, its just too bad he couldnt get in shape and have the same mind set when he took on Holyfield in his next fight. I think both Buster and Sanders are very similair, talented and were all always underachievers, but they both shared the spotlight for a brief periods in there careers.

 

:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl

What an idiot. I never said Lewis's prime was whenever it suited me, I stated when I thought his prime was and you're disagreeing to try to make VITLAY look better than he actually was. We all know that you're the worst of the worst when it comes to Klitschko sack-swinging so why don't you just admit as such instead of trying to pick holes in other peoples arguments? I wouldn't mind but it's like being attacked by a dead sheep.

 

Yes you carefully chose when LL was really good based on him fighting a tough fight against a fighter you hate and beating a fighter you love ! Your more pathetic then usual here !:yep

 

:good Fair enough ! Cheers !

 

Yes and the fact that the time-line matches what I say really ****s up my argument doesn't it :roll: Or did Lewis use a Delorean time machine to travel back for the Holyfield fights immediately after he turned VITLAYS face into a used tampon?

 

The fact of how convienently you chose these times is what its all about WEIGHT ! :yep

 

Oh right, so me choosing to say that Lewis was past his best in his last ever fight, and still pretty good but not in his prime a year before that in some way makes me a hypocrite? Rigggghhht :nut

 

Holly"Godly"field would **** tyson 10 out of 10. and TKO him .

 

:good COULDN'T AGREE MORE!!

 

Your screen name indicates your Godliness.

:good

 

so he doesnt ko tucker and bonecrusher but he somehow ko's the great holyfield?atsch
utter bull****.
holy would beat any version of tyson.
ride the 3 round storm,then ko mike later.
this tyson revisionism is silly.he was great,but holy was better.

 

spot on.:good

 

ibeg to differ in the first fight tyson gave holy all ne could handle and the version of tyson was no where near prime imo