IBF welterweight titlist Felix Trinidad (1993-99), WBA welterweight titlist Ike Quartey (1994-98) WBC welterweight champ Pernell Whitaker (1993-1997) and WBC super welterweight champ Terry Norris (3x 1990-1997) all managed to avoid each other between 1993 and 1996. Whitaker would then lose a close decision to Oscar De La Hoya in 1997, De La Hoya would win another close one over Ike Quartey in '99 and Trinidad would outpoint a now past-it Whitaker also in 99, before De La Hoya and Trinidad met in the most disappointing superfight of the 90s, again in 1999, with Trinidad taking a highly controversial split decision. Meanwhile, Norris lost his WBC super welterweight title for the third and final time in 1997. But what if welterweight history in the 90s had played out a little differently and these four had faced off against each other at their best in a round robin tournament? Here are the matchups: -Trinidad v Quartey -Trinidad v Norris -Trinidad v Whitaker -Whitaker v Norris -Quartey v Whitaker -Quartey v Norris Who wins overall? Note that the fights with Norris would take place at 154, not 147. Does that change anything?
I pick Norris to beat all of them because he was a natural light middle, Trinidad got decked by leser punchers than Norris at welter, if Norris decided to box I feel he`d be sharper than Quartey and Whitaker at 154lbs, Pea looked bad vs Vaquez when winning a light middle title, he was too slow at that weight, Quartey was awful vs Wright, again if Norris boxed smart he should win, I feel he would have done better vs Winky than Quartey did at any rate.
But Norris was arguably the most vulnerable of the four. He could box very well when he wanted to but he was also ill disciplined in the ring with a hair trigger temper and a weak chin. Those are all factors against Norris.
A Welterweight tournament, so I'm assuming all the fights happen at 147. Trinidad easily wins, don't even think Norris can make 147 without being severely weight drained. Nvm, didn't read full post. Trinidad still wins.