The Foreman that fought Holyfield in 1991 vs. the Holyfield who fought Lewis for the 2nd time in 1999. I think Holyfield had slowed down enough for Big George to earn the win.
Holyfield UD, pretty much the same as before, Old Formeman isnt ko'ing Holy and Holy still has loads of speed on him
Holyfield of 99 was far more cautious than the punch happy fighter of 91. I still think he wins a fairly easy UD.
Holyfield in 1999 fought in spurts(unlike in 91)...but in 1999 holyfields punches were much harder than in 91.........holyfield at age 36 still beats a 42 yr old george foreman.
The fight would be more competitive, as Holyfield wasn't as fast or zippy with his combinations in 1999. But I still think Holyfield wins a comfortable decision. George was just too slow and plodding to beat a guy like HOlyfield, even a slowed down version.
I think probably Holyfield again. Same argument. He's got enough to outwork Foreman anyway and enough durability to survive when he does eventually get cracked here and there.
Holyfied was one straight right away from being ktfo in the first fight, 1999 Holy was slow enough (maybe from the massive amount of muscle steroids pumped into him) that big George would connect. Foreman KO mid rounds
Foreman came on strong that night in April 1991, he put Holyfield under some pressure and had hit hurt a bit, even though Holyfield gave him a beating at about 5000% interest returned. The 1999 Holyfield was a lot less capble of boxing an entire 3 minutes a round at his normal work-rate, and it makes this a really close fight.
Holyfield would still outwork him. his hands are still much faster then foreman but it would still be close in my opinion I see Holyfield coming through with a UD again
