1991 George Foreman vs present day Daniel Dubois

You might want to go back and watch Zaire. Foreman quit at the end.

 

Stewart is probably the closest to Dubois in style. That didn’t go well for Foreman.

 

There's practical strength vs weight room strength I guess?

 

Neither Usyk nor Miller have much in common with Foreman.

 

Im not gonna debate this with you again

 

I’m correct and you’re trying to persist with your Foreman belittling narrative. I won’t say that’s fine but you do you.

 

It’s getting pretty desperate now.

 

Joshuas not as good as prime Holyfield. Bowe also beat Donald and Hide who were talented fringe contender heavyweights. He was also supposed to fight Ray Mercer but Mercer lost to Ferguson. Donald would beat Dubois 100%, he fought similar to Ali and had an iron chin. Donald was an underrated heavyweight. Bowe is better than Dubois it's not even close, he was undisciplined and had bad performances, but he was elite at his best. Coetzer was also an underrated fringe contender, better than someone like Lerena and Miller

 

That's a very polite way of putting it hahahaha

 

Nope im not confused on anything.

I call it manual labour strength and natural strength and the 3rd aspect gym strength.
Foreman had the first 2 all his life. The 3rd its clear he did weights during his comeback.

Dubois was made to do some unorthodox training by his father. Hes a strong man but moreso in a modern day gym sense. He has been pushed and forced back many times in his career....no one did that to Foreman.

Regardless Foreman is far stronger than Dubois and Dubois isnt ' smoking' any version of Foreman in my opinion.

 

It went terrible for Foreman but he still won.
Stewart was knocked down a couple of times early and got up and moved well the rest of the fight. Maybe Dubois can do that. Anything is possible.

 

He didn’t quit.

Absolute revisionism.

It was the first time he had ever been down, alien territory and he was both discombobulated and heavily fatigued.

The count wasn’t fast as some believed as at the time - but it was sheer - an exact 10 sec count.

Many counts have been an actual 1-3 secs longer than 10 secs on average, (thus the false impression that the count was fast) - and had that been the case in Zaire (say a 11-13 sec count), George would’ve beaten such a count.

 

Dubois wouldn't even beat Tony Tucker and Tubbs. Witherspoon would have knocked him out like he did Bruno. Would Dubois even beat Trevor Berbick and Carl Williams ? He could lose all of these fights

 

MAYBE because Foreman wasn’t fighting guys his own size? - manual labour strength is a myth FFS mate I did a ton of it growing up, I worked the fields I did all the things these old timers sell you as making you so strong, shovelling, chopping wood, sledgehammers, wheelbarrows, brick laying blah blah blah … I hate to break it to you, it didn’t make me a beast at grappling in the ring or a monster… I was stronger then someone who didn’t exercise that’s it lol - basically you’re making things up “oh he’s stronger because I said so” there is a more to suggest Dubios is stronger and it’s basically because he’s bigger, leaner lifts weights and uses PED’s while Foreman is smaller, fatter, lifts but never hung with 250lbs opponents he’s unproven.