Holyfield wins. People forgot how good Holyfield was in every department. Speed, great skills, stamina, great variety of punches, good power, iron chin. Just watch again Holyfield's best fights from 1988-1993 and you'll see how good he was. Povetkin is good, yes. But he won't beat prime Holyfield. He beat past prime Chagaev 8-4 or 7-5, and the famous Huck fight in 2012. Holyfield is 100 times better than Huck.
Yet some people vote for Povetkin 2012. So they think Marco Huck is better than prime Holyfield. They must think Firat Arslan is better too, as he kicked Huck **** in 2012 :rofl
povetkin is better than michael moorer. just! as a heavyweight. so arguement is null bro. or is 1991 holyfield far better than 1994 holyfield. :blurp id say 2014 povetkin is better. why didnt the op put current povetkin in there. and i prefer holyfield just saying.
Povetkin is overrated, he would have lost to Michael Moorer too. Povetkin would have lost to Chambers, but Chambers for some reason stopped throwing punches. And lol Povetkin beating a prime Holyfield. Holyfield who knocked out Douglas and went to war with Bowe?
:rofl:rofl:rofl Povetkin would have beaten Moorer like he stole stomething. Remember Moorer needed a borderline robbery SD vs Eurobum Axel Schulz. The same Schulz who was beaten to shreds by a 23 year old Wlad Klitschko. Povetkin looked competitive with Wlad for a number of rounds, unlike Schulz. Povetkin was faster, better chin, harder punch than former LHW Moorer. Better in every department than Moorer in fact. This would be a one-sided beatdown. BTW: I remember you from way back on this forum. You picked Chambers to demolish Wlad. Then you seemingly took a break. Welcome back!
holyfield with ease / no problem at all / holyfields chin would eat sashas shots and holyfields counter punching would fuk povetkin up = holy by tko