The May 1994 Ring magazine rated the all time top five in each division , giving honourable mentions to others, and saying who was overated /underated. So nearly 20 years ago, here they are ,what do you think? H. 1.Ali 2.Louis 3.Johnson [ think a few will disagree with this!] 4.Marciano 5.Dempsey [ditto no3!] LH 1.Charles 2.Moore 3.Foster 4.Tunney 5.Loughran No Langford? M 1.SRR 2.Monzon 3.Greb 4.Ketchel 5.Hagler W 1.Armstrong 2.SRR 3.SRL 4.Ross 5.McLarnin L 1.Duran 2.Leonard 3.Gans 4.Canzoneri 5.Williams F 1.Pep 2.McGovern 3.Attell 4. Saddler 5.Sanchez B 1.Zarate 2.Jofre 3.Olivares 4.Ortiz 5.Brown F 1.Wilde 2.Canto 3.Perez 4.Genaro 5.Lynch I didn't include the junior divisions , I think there is enough to argue about here! I know many fine fighters came after this , let's just concentrate on those who had fought up to that point. Thoughts please?
Tough break for Michael Spinks. Armstrong above Robbie at 147lbs? Driscoll should be a lock for the top five at 126lbs. Jofre above Zarate, every time. No Pancho Villa in the top five at flyweight?
Johnson is tricky because he was stopped early in his career several times and often late in his career. In between he had one of the longest dominant runs in HW history. His defeating of the top black contenders on way to title is more impressive than his actual title defenses. Same with Dempsey his run to the title is better than his defenses. I do not rate Johnson as highly but I can understand his placement. Ditto for Dempsey. LH Langford has to make the list some way MW I would place Greb at one WW I would flip Robinson and Armstrong just because I think Robinson has to place one somewhere and he was better ww than mw
Ring Magazine likes to use popular names to sell magazines. Most boxing fans who pay for PPV do not know who Langford was, but do know who Dempsey and Johnson were. Regarding Johnson's wins over the black fighters, its misunderstood. He actually drew with Battling Jim Johnson in a title fight ( Some feel he lost it ). There was no re-match, and Johnson kept his lineal title. His win over Sam McVey happened when McVey was a teenager 2x and but 20 on the 3rd match. Joe Jeannette was a raw novice with a losing record in some of the matches when he meet Johnson, and Sam Langford was also 20. and just 156 pounds. Not so impressive if you ask me... Had Johnson fought and beat them when they were in their prime from 1908-1912 it would have been much more impressive.
It would have been nice if you could have commented on the list as a whole , but I suppose some things never change. [Despite the Wills thread!]
I know Mendoza you are anti Johnson and Mcvey you are pro Johnson I think you both make good arguments. I don't want to hijack this thread with this debate but I would like to know from each of you what you think are Johnson's three best wins. If you want to bump another article or point me in right direction it would be most appreciated. I also agree with an above poster of jofre over zarate
With the comeback a few years earlier, Zarate was fresh in the mind, and some were struggling to a name better all time 118lber.
Ring's picks at middle 1.SRR 2.Monzon 3.Greb 4.Ketchel 5.Hagler Listing Greb third is poor. I think Ketchel s very over rated.
Johnson lost and drew too often. His title run was the weakest of any tenured heavyweight champion. Nothing anyone writes will change that. As for his three best wins in a pure boxing sense they would have to come vs. opponents in their prime or near prime. I would say Tommy Burns, Denver Ed Martin, and Frank Moran are three names to consider. Johnson lost to the likes of Hart, Choynski, and Griffin, and drew to the likes of Jim Battling Johnson, and Jack O'Brien. These guys were in their prime or near prime when they beat Johnson, and for my money are very close to even with the names I listed for his best three wins.